Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

A comparive review of the differences between the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB and Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB. We covered a wide range of variables

Created date: 2020-10-06 17:35:14

Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GBZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GBZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

How are the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GBZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.6
76.0mm x 161.0mm x 8.7mm
rating-image2.8
75.0mm x 151.7mm x 7.9mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.4
IPS LCD, 6.39inch, 720 x 1560
rating-image4.2
AMOLED, 5.5inch, 1440 x 2560
Performancerating-image4.2
Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460, 1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores), 4.0GB
rating-image3.4
Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820, 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores), 4.0GB
Storage sizerating-image4.2
64.0GB
rating-image4.2
64.0GB
Batteryrating-image
rating-image4.6
3250.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
13.0MP
rating-image4.5
20.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
8.0MP
rating-image4.0
8.0MP

What is the difference between the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

The design of Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

The "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" is 161.0mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 180.0g.

The design of ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is 151.7mm long, 75.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 175.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 9.3mm in length, 1mm in width, and 0.7mm in thickness. Both the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Both the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 5g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand61/10064/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand32/10036/100
Ease of carrying around58/10060/100

Compare the display of the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

Display of the Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

The "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1560, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" has a 6.39inch screen size.

Display of the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 534ppi. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.88inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. Both the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB". The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?79/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?83/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

Camera performance of Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

The main camera of the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has 20.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 7MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10090/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

The processing capability of the Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

The processing capability of the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB", the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB". The "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" than the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". The "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet87/10077/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games81/10060/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

Battery performance of Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

Battery performance of ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3250.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet - 92/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos - 81/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

The storage capacity of the Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

The "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage.

The storage capacity of the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

The "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Both the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 96/100

Which to buy, the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" or "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" overall, "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB

ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB

Handling52/10055/100
Display67/10084/100
CPU specs84/10067/100
General rating70/10076/100

Is it recommended to buy the Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GB" and "ZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GBZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
Nokia 3.4 (2020) 64GBZTE Axon 7 (2016) 64GB
ColorFjord/Dusk/CharcoalIon Gold/Quartz Grey/Chromium Silver
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.0mm x 161.0mm x 8.7mm75.0mm x 151.7mm x 7.9mm
Weight180.0g175.0g
Display size6.39inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDAMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 15601440 x 2560
Pixel density268ppi534ppi
Battery capacity3250.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820
CPU specs1.8GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB4.0GB
Storage size64.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP20.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles