Celkon Win 400 4GB vs Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:20:35, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:24:25
How are the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" or "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" ?
What is the difference between the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
The design of Celkon Win 400 4GB
The "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is 125.4mm long, 65.0mm wide, and 10.3mm thick. It weighs 120.6g.
The design of Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB
The "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" is 114.5mm long, 62.3mm wide, and 10.4mm thick. It weighs 95.5g.
Which is the better design to use?
Both the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB". Both the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 25g. The "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Celkon Win 400 4GB | Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 75/100 | 78/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 77/100 | 98/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 67/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the display of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
Display of the Celkon Win 400 4GB
The "Celkon Win 400 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Celkon Win 400 4GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Display of the Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB
The "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" offers a more suitable screen size. Neither the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" nor the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
In terms of display, the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" nor the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Celkon Win 400 4GB | Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 46/100 | 25/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 25/100 | 15/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
Camera performance of Celkon Win 400 4GB
The main camera of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.
Camera performance of Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB
The main camera of the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "Celkon Win 400 4GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Celkon Win 400 4GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
Celkon Win 400 4GB | Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 20/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 55/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
The processing capability of the Celkon Win 400 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
The processing capability of the Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" uses the Spreadtrum 7715 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB", the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 256MB difference in memory capacity. The memory of "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is slightly larger, so "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is recommended over "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" for multitasking.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Celkon Win 400 4GB". The "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" nor the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Celkon Win 400 4GB | Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 44/100 | 17/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 6/100 | 3/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
Battery performance of Celkon Win 400 4GB
The "Celkon Win 400 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB
The "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1200.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 300mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB".
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.
Celkon Win 400 4GB | Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 59/100 | 58/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 37/100 | 36/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
The storage capacity of the Celkon Win 400 4GB
The "Celkon Win 400 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB
The "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 508GB. The "Celkon Win 400 4GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" nor the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 4GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Celkon Win 400 4GB" or "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB".
Celkon Win 400 4GB | Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 17/100 | 2/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 55/100 | 54/100 |
Which to buy, the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" or "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" or "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB"?
"Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 4.0inch makes the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" a lot easier to use. The "Celkon Win 400 4GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" overall, "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Celkon Win 400 4GB | Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 73/100 | 81/100 |
Display | 34/100 | 18/100 |
CPU specs | 23/100 | 11/100 |
General rating | 41/100 | 34/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Win 400 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" looks compact, and is quite excellent in its ease of being held. It is recommended if you are looking for a device that can be easily operated and held with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Celkon Win 400 4GB" and "Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Celkon Win 400 4GB | Celkon A359 (2015) 512MB | |
Color | Black | Black/Red+Black/Light Blue/Dark Blue/Brown/Silver |
OS | Windows | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 65.0mm x 125.4mm x 10.3mm | 62.3mm x 114.5mm x 10.4mm |
Weight | 120.6g | 95.5g |
Display size | 4.0inch | 3.5inch |
Display type | TFT | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 800 | 320 x 480 |
Pixel density | 233ppi | 164ppi |
Battery capacity | 1500.0mAh | 1200.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 | Spreadtrum 7715 |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 256.0MB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 512.0MB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 2.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 3.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |