Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB vs Cat S40 (2015) 16GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:48:04, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:41:24
How are the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB | Cat S40 (2015) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 43.6/100 (The 726th of all smartphones) | 43/100 (The 732th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 60/100 | 49/100 | ||
Screen quality | 61/100 | 46/100 | ||
Performance | 28/100 | 26/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 88/100 | 92/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 50/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 50/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" or "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
The design of Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB
The "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" is 152.0mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 143.8g.
The design of Cat S40 (2015) 16GB
The "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" is 144.9mm long, 74.1mm wide, and 12.5mm thick. It weighs 185.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 7mm in length, 1.9mm in width, and 4.6mm in thickness. "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB". Both the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 41.1g. The "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB | Cat S40 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 62/100 | 57/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 58/100 | 29/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 56/100 |
Compare the display of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
Display of the Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB
The "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the Cat S40 (2015) 16GB
The "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 234ppi. The "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" nor the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB | Cat S40 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 63/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
Camera performance of Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB
The main camera of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of Cat S40 (2015) 16GB
The main camera of the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB | Cat S40 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 50/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
The processing capability of the Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the Cat S40 (2015) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" equally.
There is basically no difference between "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" nor the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB | Cat S40 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 47/100 | 41/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 12/100 | 11/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
Battery performance of Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB
The "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Cat S40 (2015) 16GB
The "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" is a bit better. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB". Both the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB | Cat S40 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 88/100 | 92/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 76/100 | 83/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB
The "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Cat S40 (2015) 16GB
The "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" or "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" or "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB".
Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB | Cat S40 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 67/100 | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" or "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" or "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB | Cat S40 (2015) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 60/100 | 49/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 46/100 |
CPU specs | 28/100 | 26/100 |
General rating | 56/100 | 52/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the Cat S40 (2015) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB" and "Cat S40 (2015) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Celkon Millennia Epic Q550 16GB | Cat S40 (2015) 16GB | |
Color | Black/White | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.0mm x 152.0mm x 7.9mm | 74.1mm x 144.9mm x 12.5mm |
Weight | 143.8g | 185.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 540 x 960 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 234ppi |
Battery capacity | 3500.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6582 | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |