Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB vs Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:21:25, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:01:42
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" or "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
- 2-1.At the end of the day which is better, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" or "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"?
- 2-2.Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
- 2-3.Is it recommended to buy the Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1, compared with other smartphones?
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" ?
What is the difference between the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
The design of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is 145.6mm long, 71.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 149.0g.
The design of Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1
The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" is 143.0mm long, 70.0mm wide, and 6.8mm thick. It weighs 130.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 2.5mm in length, 1.7mm in width, and 1.2mm in thickness. Both the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1". Both the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 19g. The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB | Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1 | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 70/100 | 73/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 54/100 | 70/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 63/100 | 65/100 |
Compare the display of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
Display of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1
The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.
In terms of display, the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB | Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1 | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
Camera performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
The main camera of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1
The main camera of the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB | Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1 | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 50/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
The processing capability of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses the Broadcom BCM23550 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" uses the MediaTek MT6753 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1". The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" than the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB".
Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB | Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1 | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 70/100 | 79/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 31/100 | 44/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
Battery performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1
The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" has a battery capacity of 2100.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 400mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1". Both the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB | Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1 | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 76/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 55/100 | 48/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
The storage capacity of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1
The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" has 16.0GB of internal memory.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" or "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB | Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1 | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 59/100 | - |
Which to buy, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" or "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" or "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1"?
"Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" a lot easier to use. The "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" overall, "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB | Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1 | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 63/100 | 69/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 70/100 |
CPU specs | 47/100 | 62/100 |
General rating | 56/100 | 66/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" and "Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB | Star Digital ONE-FIVE F1 | |
Color | White | White/Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm | 70.0mm x 143.0mm x 6.8mm |
Weight | 149.0g | 130.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 440ppi |
Battery capacity | 2500.0mAh | 2100.0mAh |
Chipset | Broadcom BCM23550 | MediaTek MT6753 |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 5.0MP |