Coolpad Note 3s 32GB vs Haier G51 (2017)
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:10:37, Updated date: 2020-04-15 17:33:32
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)".
Coolpad Note 3s 32GB | Haier G51 (2017) | |||
General rating: | 51.1/100 (The 572th of all smartphones) | 44/100 (The 713th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 54/100 | 59/100 | ||
Screen quality | 61/100 | 48/100 | ||
Performance | 64/100 | 27/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 78/100 | 75/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 65/100 |
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and the "Haier G51 (2017)"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" or "Haier G51 (2017)"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)" ?
What is the difference between the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and the "Haier G51 (2017)"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
The design of Coolpad Note 3s 32GB
The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is 154.5mm long, 77.4mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 163.0g.
The design of Haier G51 (2017)
The "Haier G51 (2017)" is 142.6mm long, 72.9mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 11.9mm in length, 4.5mm in width, and 0.7mm in thickness. "Haier G51 (2017)" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Haier G51 (2017)" is bigger than "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 8g. "Haier G51 (2017)" weighs less than "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and is easier to handle.
Coolpad Note 3s 32GB | Haier G51 (2017) | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 59/100 | 66/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 44/100 | 49/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the display of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
Display of the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB
The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the Haier G51 (2017)
The "Haier G51 (2017)" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Haier G51 (2017)" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" nor the "Haier G51 (2017)" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Coolpad Note 3s 32GB | Haier G51 (2017) | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
Camera performance of Coolpad Note 3s 32GB
The main camera of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Haier G51 (2017)
The main camera of the "Haier G51 (2017)" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Coolpad Note 3s 32GB | Haier G51 (2017) | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
The processing capability of the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8929 Snapdragon 415 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the Haier G51 (2017)
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Haier G51 (2017)" uses the Mediatek MT6737M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.25GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Haier G51 (2017)", the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Haier G51 (2017)". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" than the "Haier G51 (2017)". The "Haier G51 (2017)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Coolpad Note 3s 32GB | Haier G51 (2017) | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 77/100 | 44/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 51/100 | 11/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
Battery performance of Coolpad Note 3s 32GB
The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Battery performance of Haier G51 (2017)
The "Haier G51 (2017)" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is a bit better. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and the "Haier G51 (2017)". Both the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and the "Haier G51 (2017)" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're playing games or watching movies for a longer amount of time, or plan on using it for long periods, the battery of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" may be slightly better.
Coolpad Note 3s 32GB | Haier G51 (2017) | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 78/100 | 75/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 58/100 | 53/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)"
The storage capacity of the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB
The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Haier G51 (2017)
The "Haier G51 (2017)" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 24GB. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Haier G51 (2017)" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Haier G51 (2017)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 24GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is recommended over "Haier G51 (2017)" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.
Coolpad Note 3s 32GB | Haier G51 (2017) | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 65/100 | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" or "Haier G51 (2017)"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" or "Haier G51 (2017)"?
"Haier G51 (2017)" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and the "Haier G51 (2017)", the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Coolpad Note 3s 32GB | Haier G51 (2017) | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 54/100 | 59/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 48/100 |
CPU specs | 64/100 | 27/100 |
General rating | 63/100 | 47/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Haier G51 (2017), compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Haier G51 (2017)" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Haier G51 (2017)" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" and "Haier G51 (2017)". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Coolpad Note 3s 32GB | Haier G51 (2017) | |
Color | White/Gold | black,gold,white,blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.4mm x 154.5mm x 8.3mm | 72.9mm x 142.6mm x 9.1mm |
Weight | 163.0g | 155.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 195ppi |
Battery capacity | 2500.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8929 Snapdragon 415 | Mediatek MT6737M |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.25GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |