Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB or Coolpad Mega 3 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:23:06, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:42:35

Coolpad Mega 3 16GBBLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB
Coolpad Mega 3 16GBBLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

How are the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Coolpad Mega 3 16GBBLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB
Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

General rating:

48/100

(The 639th of all smartphones)

51.3/100

(The 566th of all smartphones)

Grip
53/100
47/100
Screen quality
61/100
61/100
Performance
47/100
56/100
Storage size
70/100
78/100
Battery
88/100
100/100
Rear-camera resolution
50/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

The design of Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

The "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" is 152.0mm long, 77.0mm wide, and 8.2mm thick. It weighs 170.0g.

The design of BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is 153.0mm long, 76.6mm wide, and 10.5mm thick. It weighs 191.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 1mm in length, 0.4mm in width, and 2.3mm in thickness. Both the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB". Both the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 21g. The "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand60/10056/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand39/10025/100
Ease of carrying around57/10055/100

Compare the display of the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

Display of the Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

The "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" nor the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

Camera performance of Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

The main camera of the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

The main camera of the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

The processing capability of the Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB", the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" edges out the competition.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" than the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB".

Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet70/10073/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games31/10045/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

Battery performance of Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

The "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3050.0mAh.

Battery performance of BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 950mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" over the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB". Both the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet88/100100/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos75/100100/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

The "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 48GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos59/10070/100

Which to buy, the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" or "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" or "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB"?

"Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB". "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. When comparing "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" overall, "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Coolpad Mega 3 16GB

BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB

Handling53/10047/100
Display61/10061/100
CPU specs47/10056/100
General rating59/10066/100

Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Mega 3 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Coolpad Mega 3 16GB" and "BLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Coolpad Mega 3 16GBBLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB
Coolpad Mega 3 16GBBLU R1 Plus (2017) 32GB
ColorChampagne White/Moondust Grey/Gold WhiteBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.0mm x 152.0mm x 8.2mm76.6mm x 153.0mm x 10.5mm
Weight170.0g191.0g
Display size5.5inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi267ppi
Battery capacity3050.0mAh4000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6737Mediatek MT6737
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB3.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles