Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB vs ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:22:16, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:44:43
How are the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB | |||
General rating: | 51/100 (The 583th of all smartphones) | 62.9/100 (The 235th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 54/100 | 58/100 | ||
Screen quality | 61/100 | 74/100 | ||
Performance | 64/100 | 76/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 78/100 | ||
Battery | 78/100 | 87/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" or "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
The design of Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is 154.0mm long, 76.5mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 163.0g.
The design of ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB
The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" is 149.0mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 150.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 5mm in length, 0.5mm in width, and 0.7mm in thickness. Both the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB". Both the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 13g. "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" weighs less than "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and is easier to handle.
Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 60/100 | 62/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 44/100 | 53/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 59/100 |
Compare the display of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
Display of the Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB
The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" uses a IPS liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB". The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
Camera performance of Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
The main camera of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB
The main camera of the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
The processing capability of the Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.36GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" uses the Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
"ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" edges out the competition. Both the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" than the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB". The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 78/100 | 81/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 52/100 | 72/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
Battery performance of Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Battery performance of ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB
The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" over the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB". Both the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 78/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 58/100 | 74/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB
The "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB
The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 112GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 59/100 | 78/100 |
Which to buy, the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" or "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" or "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" and the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB", the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 54/100 | 58/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 64/100 | 76/100 |
General rating | 61/100 | 72/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB" and "ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Coolpad Torino (2016) 16GB | ZenFone 3 Laser 32GB | |
Color | White+Gold | / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.5mm x 154.0mm x 8.7mm | 76.0mm x 149.0mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 163.0g | 150.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 2500.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 | Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 |
CPU specs | 1.36GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |