Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB vs MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:17:34, Updated date: 2021-10-20 13:56:43

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GBMADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GBMADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB".

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GBMADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

General rating:

39.1/100

(The 826th of all smartphones)

44.5/100

(The 702th of all smartphones)

Grip
73/100
69/100
Screen quality
46/100
56/100
Performance
27/100
27/100
Storage size
35/100
35/100
Battery
66/100
75/100
Rear-camera resolution
50/100
50/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
50/100

What is the difference between the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"

The design of Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

The "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" is 139.0mm long, 67.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 119.0g.

The design of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 142.8mm long, 70.4mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 3.8mm in length, 2.6mm in width, and 0.4mm in thickness. Both the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Both the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 6g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Ease of holding it in one hand74/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand79/10074/100
Ease of carrying around66/10064/100

Compare the display of the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"

Display of the Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

The "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 234ppi. The "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.

Display of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" uses a IPS liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. In the gaming end, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size.

In terms of display, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" nor the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?63/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?48/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"

Camera performance of Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

The main camera of the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

The main camera of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"

The processing capability of the Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" uses the Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" nor the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet44/10044/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games11/10011/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"

Battery performance of Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

The "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1800.0mAh.

Battery performance of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2300.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB". The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet66/10075/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos42/10054/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"

The storage capacity of the Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

The "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" nor the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 32GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is recommended over "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games35/10035/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos56/10066/100

Which to buy, the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". If you want a larger screen, "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is recommended as it has a 5.0inch screen. There isn't much difference between "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB

MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Handling73/10069/100
Display46/10056/100
CPU specs27/10027/100
General rating48/10050/100

Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GBMADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
Coolpad Porto (2015) 8GBMADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
ColorWhite
OSAndroidWindows
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)67.8mm x 139.0mm x 8.0mm70.4mm x 142.8mm x 8.4mm
Weight119.0g125.0g
Display size4.7inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS
Screen resolution (width x height)540 x 960720 x 1280
Pixel density234ppi293ppi
Battery capacity1800.0mAh2300.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB1.0GB
Storage size8.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles