Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB vs BQ Aquaris U2 Lite: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:22:15, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:31:32

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GBBQ Aquaris U2 Lite
HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GBBQ Aquaris U2 Lite

How are the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GBBQ Aquaris U2 Lite
HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

BQ Aquaris U2 Lite
General rating:

63.4/100

(The 226th of all smartphones)

58.2/100

(The 384th of all smartphones)

Grip
50/100
60/100
Screen quality
84/100
60/100
Performance
67/100
48/100
Storage size
90/100
70/100
Battery
88/100
96/100
Rear-camera resolution
70/100
50/100
Front-camera resolution
100/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite"

The design of HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is 162.4mm long, 79.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 170.0g.

The design of BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

The "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" is 148.1mm long, 72.9mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 14.3mm in length, 6.8mm in width, and 0.4mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" is more compact than "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 15g. "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" weighs less than "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and is easier to handle.

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

Ease of holding it in one hand54/10068/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand39/10049/100
Ease of carrying around55/10062/100

Compare the display of the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite"

Display of the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" uses a Super LCD5 liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 515ppi. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Display of the BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

The "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite". The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

How suited is the screen for usual usage?73/10070/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10070/100

Compare the camera performances of the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite"

Camera performance of HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

The main camera of the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Camera performance of BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

The main camera of the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 4MP difference in comparison. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?70/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite"

The processing capability of the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

The processing capability of the BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite", the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has more memory storage, making the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB".

The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" than the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite".

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet77/10071/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games60/10033/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite"

Battery performance of HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

The "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" has a battery capacity of 3100.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 100mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" over the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". Both the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet88/10096/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos76/10089/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite"

The storage capacity of the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

The "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 112GB. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" unfortunately falls behind here. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 880GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is recommended over "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games90/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos96/10090/100

Which to buy, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" or "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite"

At the end of the day which is better, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" or "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" a lot easier to use. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite", the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is overall the clear winner.

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

BQ Aquaris U2 Lite

Handling50/10060/100
Display84/10060/100
CPU specs67/10048/100
General rating76/10063/100

Is it recommended to buy the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the BQ Aquaris U2 Lite, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and "BQ Aquaris U2 Lite". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GBBQ Aquaris U2 Lite
HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GBBQ Aquaris U2 Lite
ColorBrilliant Black/Cosmetic Pink/Ice White/Sapphire Blueblack,white
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)79.8mm x 162.4mm x 8.0mm72.9mm x 148.1mm x 8.4mm
Weight170.0g155.0g
Display size5.7inch5.2inch
Display typeSuper LCD5IPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 2560720 x 1280
Pixel density515ppi282ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh3100.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425
CPU specs2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB2.0GB
Storage size128.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution12.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution16.0MP5.0MP

Check price

New articles