Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

HTC Butterfly 3 32GB vs Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:41:29, Updated date: 2021-10-20 22:31:49

HTC Butterfly 3 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
HTC Butterfly 3 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How are the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

HTC Butterfly 3 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.9
57/100
rating-image3.2
63/100
Screen qualityrating-image4.2
83/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Performancerating-image3.8
76/100
rating-image2.4
47/100
Storage sizerating-image3.9
78/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Batteryrating-image4.1
81/100
rating-image3.8
76/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image1.0
20/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image2.5
50/100

What is the difference between the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The design of HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" is 151.0mm long, 73.0mm wide, and 10.0mm thick. It weighs 161.0g.

The design of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is 145.6mm long, 71.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 149.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 5.4mm in length, 1.2mm in width, and 2mm in thickness. "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is bigger than "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 12g. "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" weighs less than "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and is easier to handle.

HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand64/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand45/10054/100
Ease of carrying around60/10063/100

Compare the display of the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Display of the HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 564ppi. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Display of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?70/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?70/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Camera performance of HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

The main camera of the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has 2.0MP. The front camera has 13.0MP.

Camera performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The main camera of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 6MP difference in comparison. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.

There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?20/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The processing capability of the HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses the Broadcom BCM23550 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB". The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" than the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB".

HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet84/10070/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games68/10031/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Battery performance of HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2700.0mAh.

Battery performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" slightly more. Both the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.

HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet81/10076/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos64/10055/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The storage capacity of the HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 240GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10059/100

Which to buy, the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"?

"Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

HTC Butterfly 3 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Handling57/10063/100
Display83/10056/100
CPU specs76/10047/100
General rating71/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the HTC Butterfly 3 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "HTC Butterfly 3 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

HTC Butterfly 3 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
HTC Butterfly 3 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
ColorBlue/Red/WhiteWhite
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.0mm x 151.0mm x 10.0mm71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm
Weight161.0g149.0g
Display size5.2inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 2560720 x 1280
Pixel density564ppi293ppi
Battery capacity2700.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810Broadcom BCM23550
CPU specs2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution2.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution13.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles