AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank review
Created date: 02/24/2018, 22:08:26, Updated date: 04/04/2020, 05:37:41
What are the strengths of the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank? We explain its advantages and disadvantages when compared to other smartphone. Even if you are not used to choosing between different smartphone, you'll learn to make the decision of whether or not the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank is right for you.
Summary of rating | Compare ratings with all 4286 smartphones |
|---|
| Aspect | Score |
|---|---|
| Grip | 71/100 |
| Screen size | 69/100 |
| Screen quality | 86/100 |
| Battery life | 56/100 |
| CPU specs | 63/100 |
| Multi-tasking | 60/100 |
| Camera specs | 69/100 |
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank's features, performance, reviews
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank's size
The AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank has a width of 2.6 inches (67 mm), a length of 5.3 inches (135 mm), and a thickness of 0.3 inches (8.6 mm). Men with large hands can easily operate it single-handedly, but a woman with a small hand might feel like the size is a bit bigger. In addition, the weight of the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank is about 134 oz (134 g). Even if you are operating it with one hand it feels almost weightless. However, depending on the person, you may feel tired after using it for a while.
Assessing the overall ease of carrying the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank in terms of size and weight, it will not be a problem for everyday use.
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank's screen
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank has a 4.7 inch display. It is large enough and you will rarely encounter issues due to the screen size. However, note that it is not very suited for writing long text.
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank has a very high-quality screen and any graphical content that you enjoy, including videos and games, will be displayed clearly.
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank's CPU specs
With the 1.5GHz×8(OctaCore) for processing power, the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank has relatively high performance. Among all smartphones released to date, its performance is positioned between high level and middle class, but you won't feel any stress using most apps. For lighter 3D games you will almost always be able to play without complaint. And for 2D gaming you will probably feel hardly any stress.
With 3GB of RAM, the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank has a sufficient amount. Very occasional cases of insufficient RAM do occur, but with this sort of amount of RAM, it will rarely be the cause of feeling any stress.
Evaluating the overall speed of operation of the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank, it is a smartphone in the high-end category and can almost always be used without stress. However, if you want smooth and comfortable usage in heavy apps like 3D games, caution is necessary.
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank's storage size
The data storage capacity of the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank is 16GB, and while it is enough for taking photos, it might feel insufficient for those who often shoot videos or who install many games.
The AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank is compatible with SD cards, so it is possible to increase the capacity easily. Therefore, you probably do not need to be concerned with the storage capacity.
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank's camera specs
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank has a 21 MP main camera, which is an extremely high figure. As this camera can take very high-quality photos, you will rarely feel frustrated with the quality. You can comfortably rely on this smartphone's camera.
Also, AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank has an 8 MP front camera, which is an average figure for a smartphone camera. It is good enough for taking selfies, but you may be a little dissatisfied when you need to take a group photo or print your photos.
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank's battery performance
The battery performance of the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank is 2400 mAh, which is a normal capacity. Compared to other smartphones, the AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank has a normal amount of battery life. There is nothing to be worried about with everyday use. However, if you are using the internet or playing a game for a long time, you might feel a bit frustrated with the battery life.
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank's general rating
The AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank is a high-performance smartphone when viewed comprehensively. It works for everyday use with hardly any inconvenience.
Advantages and disadvantages of AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank
Advantages of AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank
- It is easy to hold, and you can use it comfortably with one hand.
- It is lightweight.
- The screen quality is very high, and pictures and videos appear crisp.
- It has an extremely high-grade rear camera, so you can take Instagrammable pictures or landscape photography.
Disadvantages of AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank
- no data
Comparing the specifications of AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank against similar products
body size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65.9 | - | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.3 inches (135 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.6 mm) | |||||
| 59.0 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.6 inches (143 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.3 mm) | ||||||
| 59.0 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.6 inches (143 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.3 mm) | ||||||
| 58.9 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.6 inches (143 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.4 mm) | ||||||
| 59.0 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.6 inches (143 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.3 mm) | ||||||
| 55.9 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (73 mm) x 5.9 inches (149 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.2 mm) | ||||||
| 59.5 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.4 inches (136 mm) x 0.4 inches (11 mm) | ||||||
| 71.4 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (66 mm) x 5.0 inches (126 mm) x 0.4 inches (9 mm) | ||||||
body weight
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body weight | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76.7 | - | Weight:134 oz (134 g) | |||||
| 75.1 | ≈ | Weight:138 oz (138 g) | |||||
| 75.5 | ≈ | Weight:137 oz (137 g) | |||||
| 75.5 | ≈ | Weight:137 oz (137 g) | |||||
| 75.1 | ≈ | Weight:138 oz (138 g) | |||||
| 68.4 | Weight:155 oz (155 g) | ||||||
| 69.1 | Weight:153 oz (153 g) | ||||||
| 82.3 | Weight:120 oz (120 g) | ||||||
screen size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69.2 | - | Display size:4.7 inch | |||||
| 74.0 | ≈ | Display size:5 inch | |||||
| 74.0 | ≈ | Display size:5 inch | |||||
| 74.0 | ≈ | Display size:5 inch | |||||
| 74.0 | ≈ | Display size:5 inch | |||||
| 78.8 | Display size:5.3 inch | ||||||
| 77.2 | Display size:5.2 inch | ||||||
| 69.2 | ≈ | Display size:4.7 inch | |||||
screen resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68.7 | - | ||||||
| 41.7 | |||||||
| 41.7 | |||||||
| 41.7 | |||||||
| 68.7 | ≈ | ||||||
| 41.7 | |||||||
| 68.7 | ≈ | ||||||
| 41.7 | |||||||
RAM capacity
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | RAM capacity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.0 | - | RAM size:3GB | |||||
| 50.0 | RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 50.0 | RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 50.0 | RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 50.0 | RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 60.0 | ≈ | RAM size:3GB | |||||
| 50.0 | RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 60.0 | ≈ | RAM size:3GB | |||||
storage size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | storage size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.0 | - | Storage size:16GB | |||||
| 50.0 | ≈ | Storage size:16GB | |||||
| 50.0 | ≈ | Storage size:16GB | |||||
| 50.0 | ≈ | Storage size:16GB | |||||
| 50.0 | ≈ | Storage size:16GB | |||||
| 55.5 | Storage size:32GB | ||||||
| 50.0 | ≈ | Storage size:16GB | |||||
| 50.0 | ≈ | Storage size:16GB | |||||
battery
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | battery | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.0 | - | Battery capacity:2400 mAh | |||||
| 60.5 | ≈ | Battery capacity:2700 mAh | |||||
| 60.5 | ≈ | Battery capacity:2700 mAh | |||||
| 60.5 | ≈ | Battery capacity:2700 mAh | |||||
| 60.5 | ≈ | Battery capacity:2700 mAh | |||||
| 65.0 | Battery capacity:3000 mAh | ||||||
| 50.5 | Battery capacity:2030 mAh | ||||||
| 62.2 | Battery capacity:2810 mAh | ||||||
rear-camera resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | rear-camera resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.6 | - | Rear-camera resolution:21 MP | |||||
| 61.9 | Rear-camera resolution:13.1 MP | ||||||
| 61.9 | Rear-camera resolution:13.1 MP | ||||||
| 61.9 | Rear-camera resolution:13.1 MP | ||||||
| 61.9 | Rear-camera resolution:13.1 MP | ||||||
| 84.3 | ≈ | Rear-camera resolution:22.6 MP | |||||
| 50.0 | Rear-camera resolution:8 MP | ||||||
| 61.9 | Rear-camera resolution:13.1 MP | ||||||
front-camera resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | front-camera resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.3 | - | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | ||||||
| 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | ||||||
| 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | ||||||
| 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | ||||||
| 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | ||||||
| 16.9 | Front-camera resolution:2.1 MP | ||||||
| 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | ||||||
grip
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | grip | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71.3 | - | Color:/ / / /, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.3 inches (135 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.6 mm), Weight:134 oz (134 g) | |||||
| 67.0 | ≈ | Color:White/Navy, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.6 inches (143 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.3 mm), Weight:138 oz (138 g) | |||||
| 67.2 | ≈ | Color:Blue/White/Pink, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.6 inches (143 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.3 mm), Weight:137 oz (137 g) | |||||
| 67.2 | ≈ | Color:× / × / × / ×, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.6 inches (143 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.4 mm), Weight:137 oz (137 g) | |||||
| 67.0 | ≈ | Color:Champagne Gold/Pure White/Navy Black/Rose Pink, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.6 inches (143 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.3 mm), Weight:138 oz (138 g) | |||||
| 62.1 | Color:White/Black/Green, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (73 mm) x 5.9 inches (149 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.2 mm), Weight:155 oz (155 g) | ||||||
| 64.3 | Color:/ / /, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.4 inches (136 mm) x 0.4 inches (11 mm), Weight:153 oz (153 g) | ||||||
| 76.9 | Color:White/Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (66 mm) x 5.0 inches (126 mm) x 0.4 inches (9 mm), Weight:120 oz (120 g) | ||||||
screen cleanliness
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen cleanliness | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.7 | - | Display type:IGZO, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:468 ppi | |||||
| 59.9 | Display type:IGZO, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:293 ppi | ||||||
| 59.9 | Display type:IGZO, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:293 ppi | ||||||
| 59.9 | Display type:IGZO, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:293 ppi | ||||||
| 59.9 | Display type:IGZO, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:293 ppi | ||||||
| 85.3 | ≈ | Display type:IGZO, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:415 ppi | |||||
| 57.3 | Display type:S-CG Silicon, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:282 ppi | ||||||
| 86.7 | ≈ | Display type:IGZO, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:468 ppi | |||||
performance
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63.4 | - | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, CPU specs:1.5GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:3GB | |||||
| 52.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon 430 MSM8937, CPU specs:1.4GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 52.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937, CPU specs:1.4GHz+1.1GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 52.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon 430 MSM8937, CPU specs:1.4GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 52.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon 430 MSM8937, CPU specs:1.4GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 54.0 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, CPU specs:2.15GHz×4(Quad core), RAM size:3GB | ||||||
| 33.5 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon 400 MSM8926, CPU specs:1.2GHz×4(Quad core), RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 63.4 | ≈ | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, CPU specs:2GHz+1.6GHz×6(Hexacore), RAM size:3GB | |||||
AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank's specs
| AQUOS Xx3 mini SoftBank | ||||
| Image |  | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | ||||
| Brand | AQUOS | |||
| Release date | 2/3, 2017 | |||
| Color | / / / / | |||
| OS | Android | |||
| Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.3 inches (135 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.6 mm) | |||
| Weight | 134 oz (134 g) | |||
| Display size | 4.7 inch | |||
| Display type | IGZO | |||
| Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | |||
| Pixel density | 468 ppi | |||
| Battery capacity | 2400 mAh | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 | |||
| CPU specs | 1.5GHz×8(OctaCore) | |||
| RAM size | 3GB | |||
| Storage size | 16GB | |||
| Rear-camera resolution | 21 MP | |||
| Front-camera resolution | 8 MP | |||
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | ||||
