Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB Photos, Specs, and Reviews

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:50:36, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:25:34

What are the strengths of the XOLO Win Q900s 8GB? We explain its advantages and disadvantages when compared to other smartphone. Even if you are not used to choosing between different smartphone, you'll learn to make the decision of whether or not the XOLO Win Q900s 8GB is right for you.

Features, Performance, and Reviews for the XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB 's size

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is 67.2mm wide, 135.8mm tall, and 7.2mm thick. At this size, a man with large hands would be able to operate it comfortably with one hand, but it may feel a bit large for a woman with small hands. In the case of the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB", it weighs about 100.0g. The weight of this phone is such that you'll barely notice it at all even when using one-handed. As such, you shouldn't have any problems using it even for long periods of time.

Both the size and weight of the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" make it easy to hold in your hand and are unlikely to cause any trouble when you use it normally.

The CPU performance of XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

The processing performance of the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is quite low at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores), and you may find minor issues even while browsing the internet or Twitter.

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" only has 1.0GB of RAM, which is fairly low. The RAM is regularly insufficient, so operation gets unstable and jerky even when using apps that are not resource intensive.

In rating the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB"'s overall operational speed, it ranks at the low end of smartphones. It will lag and feel sluggish even during normal use. In most cases, users will feel the performance to be lacking.

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB 's storage capacity

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has 8.0GB of data storage. This is fine if you mainly use email or social media sites, but if you plan to take photos and videos or play games, you should buy an upgrade.

Since the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is compatible with SD cards, you'll be able to easily expand your storage capacity; you won't need to worry about how much internal space it has.

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB 's screen

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has a 4.7inch screen. The iPhone X has a big screen, which very likely won't ever trouble you. Just be aware that it's not a very good size for writing long blocks of text.

The screen of the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is very clear, so you'll likely have no complaints on that front. However, you should be cautious about viewing things in 4k definition.

The camera function of XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

The main camera of the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has a capacity of 8.0MP pixels, and is adequate for normal use. But some users may feel dissatisfied with the picture quality.

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" comes equipped with a 2.0MP pixel front-facing camera, which is very low resolution. If you aren't particular about your videos or photos, it might be fine, but otherwise, we recommend a smartphone at least one tier higher.

The battery performance of XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB"'s battery capacity is 1800.0mAh, a standard level for these types of phones. Compared to other smartphones, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has a standard battery life. It should not be a problem for normal use. However, if you spend a lot of time online or playing games, you may find the battery life a bit dissatisfying.

Overall assessment of XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB"'s performance level is that of a budget smartphone. It's a bit too weak to use as a main smartphone, so if possible you should consider something slightly more powerful. However, it should be sufficient for people that only want to use the most basic functions, like making calls and browsing the internet, and for people that don't really use smartphones much.

The merits and demerits of XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

The merits of XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

  • It's easy to hold and you can even comfortably use it with one hand.
  • Its light and quite easy to hold.

The demerits of XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

  • The CPU performance is not very good, and will become operationally sluggish when using apps.
  • The rear-facing camera is very low resolution, so you should not think of using this smartphone as your main camera.

Specifications of XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB
ImageXOLO Win Q900s 8GB
MakerXOLO
Release date2014-07
ColorBlack/White
OSWindows
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm
Weight100.0g
Display size4.7inch
Display typeIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280
Pixel density312ppi
Battery capacity1800.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB
Storage size8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check the price of XOLO Win Q900s 8GB now

Product selected
Select another product
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

General rating: 39.4/100

(The 2700th of all smartphones)

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

Comparing the specifications of XOLO Win Q900s 8GB against similar products

general rating

ImageProduct nameReviewLevel of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the twogeneral rating

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

39.4-Color:Black/White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm, Weight:100.0g, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312ppi, Display size:4.7inch, OS:Windows

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

36.8Color:Black/White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm, Weight:100.0g, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):540 x 960, Pixel density:234ppi, Display size:4.7inch, OS:Android

ZTE Grand Xmax 8GB

39.2Color:Black, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):83.1mm x 162.1mm x 7.9mm, Weight:171.8g, Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:244ppi, Display size:6.0inch, OS:Android

ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB

45.2Color:Black, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):83.8mm x 162.6mm x 8.9mm, Weight:189.9g, Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:257ppi, Display size:5.7inch, OS:Android

ZTE Kis 3 Max 4GB

33.8Color:Black/White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):66.0mm x 132.0mm x 9.1mm, Weight:135.0g, Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):480 x 854, Pixel density:217ppi, Display size:4.5inch, OS:Android

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) 32GB

56.4Color:Silver/Gray/Gold, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):76.0mm x 150.0mm x 8.7mm, Weight:164.0g, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:400ppi, Display size:5.5inch, OS:Android

Xiaomi Redmi Note 2 32GB

53.5Color:White/blue/yellow/pink/mint green, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):76.0mm x 152.0mm x 8.3mm, Weight:160.0g, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:400ppi, Display size:5.5inch, OS:Android

Xiaomi Redmi 2 Pro 16GB

48.1Color:Dark gray, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):67.0mm x 134.0mm x 9.0mm, Weight:133.0g, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312ppi, Display size:4.7inch, OS:Android

grip

ImageProduct nameReviewLevel of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the twogrip

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

78.4-Color:Black/White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm, Weight:100.0g

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

78.4Color:Black/White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm, Weight:100.0g

ZTE Grand Xmax 8GB

53.2Color:Black, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):83.1mm x 162.1mm x 7.9mm, Weight:171.8g

ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB

49.4Color:Black, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):83.8mm x 162.6mm x 8.9mm, Weight:189.9g

ZTE Kis 3 Max 4GB

72.1Color:Black/White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):66.0mm x 132.0mm x 9.1mm, Weight:135.0g

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) 32GB

58.6Color:Silver/Gray/Gold, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):76.0mm x 150.0mm x 8.7mm, Weight:164.0g

Xiaomi Redmi Note 2 32GB

59.4Color:White/blue/yellow/pink/mint green, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):76.0mm x 152.0mm x 8.3mm, Weight:160.0g

Xiaomi Redmi 2 Pro 16GB

71.6Color:Dark gray, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):67.0mm x 134.0mm x 9.0mm, Weight:133.0g

screen cleanliness

ImageProduct nameReviewLevel of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the twoscreen cleanliness

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

64.3-Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312ppi

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

42.8Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):540 x 960, Pixel density:234ppi

ZTE Grand Xmax 8GB

47.3Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:244ppi

ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB

51.4Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:257ppi

ZTE Kis 3 Max 4GB

35.1Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):480 x 854, Pixel density:217ppi

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) 32GB

85.0Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:400ppi

Xiaomi Redmi Note 2 32GB

85.0Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:400ppi

Xiaomi Redmi 2 Pro 16GB

64.3Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312ppi

screen quality

ImageProduct nameReviewLevel of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the twoscreen quality

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

69.6-Display size:4.7inch, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312ppi

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

60.1Display size:4.7inch, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):540 x 960, Pixel density:234ppi

ZTE Grand Xmax 8GB

71.9Display size:6.0inch, Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:244ppi

ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB

71.4Display size:5.7inch, Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:257ppi

ZTE Kis 3 Max 4GB

54.2Display size:4.5inch, Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):480 x 854, Pixel density:217ppi

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) 32GB

79.9Display size:5.5inch, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:400ppi

Xiaomi Redmi Note 2 32GB

79.9Display size:5.5inch, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:400ppi

Xiaomi Redmi 2 Pro 16GB

69.6Display size:4.7inch, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312ppi

performance

ImageProduct nameReviewLevel of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the twoperformance

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

14.9-OS:Windows

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

14.9OS:Android

ZTE Grand Xmax 8GB

14.9OS:Android

ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB

33.5OS:Android

ZTE Kis 3 Max 4GB

6.4OS:Android

Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) 32GB

88.2OS:Android

Xiaomi Redmi Note 2 32GB

72.3OS:Android

Xiaomi Redmi 2 Pro 16GB

33.5OS:Android