Review of SH-06D NERV docomo. Thorough explanation of the pros and cons of its functions and specifications/performances
Created date: 02/24/2018, 22:36:41, Updated date: 04/04/2020, 04:50:50
We've conducted a detailed review of the SH-06D NERV docomo, looking into its battery, how easy it is to use the camera, and whether the CPU performance is high or low. Not only that, but we've also evaluated how portable and easy to hold it is, as well as how nice the display is.
Summary of rating | Compare ratings with all 4286 smartphones |
|---|
| Aspect | Score |
|---|---|
| Grip | 70/100 |
| Screen size | 66/100 |
| Screen quality | 67/100 |
| Battery life | 35/100 |
| CPU specs | 5/100 |
| Multi-tasking | 20/100 |
| Camera specs | 25/100 |
SH-06D NERV docomo's features, performance, reviews
SH-06D NERV docomo's size
The SH-06D NERV docomo has a width of 2.6 inches (66 mm), a length of 5.0 inches (128 mm), and a thickness of 0.5 inches (11.8 mm). Men with large hands can easily operate it single-handedly, but a woman with a small hand might feel like the size is a bit bigger. In addition, the weight of the SH-06D NERV docomo is about 145 oz (145 g). Even if you are operating it with one hand it feels almost weightless. However, depending on the person, you may feel tired after using it for a while.
Assessing the overall ease of carrying the SH-06D NERV docomo in terms of size and weight, it will not be a problem for everyday use.
SH-06D NERV docomo's screen
SH-06D NERV docomo has a 4.5 inch display. It is large enough and you will rarely encounter issues due to the screen size. However, note that it is not very suited for writing long text.
SH-06D NERV docomo has a fairly high-quality screen, so you will be satisfied with it most of the time. However, note that it may not be good enough for enjoying 4K and other high-resolution content.
SH-06D NERV docomo's CPU specs
With the 1.2GHz×2(Dual core) for processing power, the SH-06D NERV docomo has low performance, and even for net browsing and Twitter usage you will probably feel a little dissatisfied.
The SH-06D NERV docomo has only 1GB of RAM, quite a small amount. Cases of insufficient RAM occur regularly so even when using light apps there will be instability in operation and jerkiness.
Evaluating the overall speed of operation of the SH-06D NERV docomo, it is a low-end smartphone and even in everyday use feels jumpy and jerky. There will probably be a lot of cases when you feel that it is lacking in performance.
SH-06D NERV docomo's storage size
The data storage capacity of the SH-06D NERV docomo is 8GB, and if its main use is for texting and social media then there is no problem, but if you plan to use it for things like photography, filming, and games, you should go with one that is a step up.
The SH-06D NERV docomo is compatible with SD cards, so it is possible to increase the capacity easily. Therefore, you probably do not need to be concerned with the storage capacity.
SH-06D NERV docomo's camera specs
SH-06D NERV docomo has a 8 MP main camera, which can serve you well in most cases. However, you might feel a little dissatisfied with the quality of the images.
Also, SH-06D NERV docomo has an 0.3 MP front camera, which is a very low figure. Unless you do not care about image quality, you should probably choose a higher-grade smartphone.
SH-06D NERV docomo's battery performance
The battery performance of the SH-06D NERV docomo is 1520 mAh, which is a relatively small capacity. Compared to other smartphones, the battery life of the SH-06D NERV docomo is not very good. It is enough to look things up on your phone occasionally, but if you are looking something up for a long time, playing games, or watching videos, you should have a spare mobile battery to be safe.
SH-06D NERV docomo's general rating
The SH-06D NERV docomo is a budget smartphone. As the main smartphone it is somewhat insufficient, and you should consider a slightly higher-end smartphone if possible. It will be enough for people who use only basic functions such as telephone and internet, or people who do not use smartphones.
Advantages and disadvantages of SH-06D NERV docomo
Advantages of SH-06D NERV docomo
- It is easy to hold, and you can use it comfortably with one hand.
- It is lightweight.
Disadvantages of SH-06D NERV docomo
- It has a low-grade CPU, so you will experience severe stuttering when using an app.
- It has a very low-grade front camera, so it should not be considered as a main camera.
Comparing the specifications of SH-06D NERV docomo against similar products
body size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67.8 | - | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (66 mm) x 5.0 inches (128 mm) x 0.5 inches (11.8 mm) | |||||
| 82.5 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.3 inches (59 mm) x 4.6 inches (116 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.9 mm) | ||||||
| 66.7 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.1 inches (130 mm) x 0.4 inches (10.8 mm) | |||||
| 62.9 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.7 inches (68 mm) x 5.3 inches (135 mm) x 0.4 inches (10.9 mm) | |||||
| 67.4 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (66 mm) x 5.0 inches (128 mm) x 0.5 inches (12.2 mm) | |||||
| 70.5 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (65 mm) x 5.0 inches (128 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.8 mm) | |||||
| 71.2 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.5 inches (64 mm) x 5.0 inches (126 mm) x 0.4 inches (11.3 mm) | |||||
| 76.4 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.4 inches (61 mm) x 4.8 inches (123 mm) x 0.4 inches (10.4 mm) | ||||||
body weight
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body weight | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72.3 | - | Weight:145 oz (145 g) | |||||
| 84.3 | Weight:115 oz (115 g) | ||||||
| 71.5 | ≈ | Weight:147 oz (147 g) | |||||
| 69.5 | ≈ | Weight:152 oz (152 g) | |||||
| 72.3 | ≈ | Weight:145 oz (145 g) | |||||
| 75.5 | ≈ | Weight:137 oz (137 g) | |||||
| 75.1 | ≈ | Weight:138 oz (138 g) | |||||
| 82.3 | Weight:120 oz (120 g) | ||||||
screen size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66.0 | - | Display size:4.5 inch | |||||
| 59.6 | Display size:4.1 inch | ||||||
| 69.2 | ≈ | Display size:4.7 inch | |||||
| 72.4 | Display size:4.9 inch | ||||||
| 66.0 | ≈ | Display size:4.5 inch | |||||
| 66.0 | ≈ | Display size:4.5 inch | |||||
| 66.0 | ≈ | Display size:4.5 inch | |||||
| 58.0 | Display size:4 inch | ||||||
screen resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41.7 | - | ||||||
| 22.5 | |||||||
| 41.7 | ≈ | ||||||
| 41.7 | ≈ | ||||||
| 41.7 | ≈ | ||||||
| 41.7 | ≈ | ||||||
| 41.7 | ≈ | ||||||
| 22.5 | |||||||
RAM capacity
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | RAM capacity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.0 | - | RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 20.0 | ≈ | RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 20.0 | ≈ | RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 50.0 | RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 20.0 | ≈ | RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 20.0 | ≈ | RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 20.0 | ≈ | RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 5.0 | RAM size:512.0MB | ||||||
storage size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | storage size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.0 | - | Storage size:8GB | |||||
| 50.0 | Storage size:16GB | ||||||
| 55.5 | Storage size:32GB | ||||||
| 55.5 | Storage size:32GB | ||||||
| 24.0 | ≈ | Storage size:8GB | |||||
| 11.0 | Storage size:4GB | ||||||
| 24.0 | ≈ | Storage size:8GB | |||||
| 11.0 | Storage size:4GB | ||||||
battery
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | battery | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35.6 | - | Battery capacity:1520 mAh | |||||
| 39.8 | ≈ | Battery capacity:1660 mAh | |||||
| 47.0 | Battery capacity:1900 mAh | ||||||
| 54.8 | Battery capacity:2320 mAh | ||||||
| 35.6 | ≈ | Battery capacity:1520 mAh | |||||
| 35.6 | ≈ | Battery capacity:1520 mAh | |||||
| 47.0 | Battery capacity:1900 mAh | ||||||
| 35.6 | ≈ | Battery capacity:1520 mAh | |||||
rear-camera resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | rear-camera resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.0 | - | Rear-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 59.6 | Rear-camera resolution:12.1 MP | ||||||
| 59.6 | Rear-camera resolution:12.1 MP | ||||||
| 69.5 | Rear-camera resolution:16.3 MP | ||||||
| 50.0 | ≈ | Rear-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 59.6 | Rear-camera resolution:12.1 MP | ||||||
| 59.6 | Rear-camera resolution:12.1 MP | ||||||
| 50.0 | ≈ | Rear-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
front-camera resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | front-camera resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | - | Front-camera resolution:0.3 MP | |||||
| 0.0 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:0.3 MP | |||||
| 0.0 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:0.3 MP | |||||
| 6.7 | Front-camera resolution:1.2 MP | ||||||
| 0.0 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:0.3 MP | |||||
| 0.0 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:0.3 MP | |||||
| 0.0 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:0.3 MP | |||||
| 0.0 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:0 MP | |||||
grip
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | grip | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70.1 | - | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (66 mm) x 5.0 inches (128 mm) x 0.5 inches (11.8 mm), Weight:145 oz (145 g) | |||||
| 83.4 | Color:Pink/White/Black/Blue, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.3 inches (59 mm) x 4.6 inches (116 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.9 mm), Weight:115 oz (115 g) | ||||||
| 69.1 | ≈ | Color:/, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.1 inches (130 mm) x 0.4 inches (10.8 mm), Weight:147 oz (147 g) | |||||
| 66.2 | ≈ | Color:Red/White/Blue, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.7 inches (68 mm) x 5.3 inches (135 mm) x 0.4 inches (10.9 mm), Weight:152 oz (152 g) | |||||
| 69.9 | ≈ | Color:Magenta Red/Blue Black/White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (66 mm) x 5.0 inches (128 mm) x 0.5 inches (12.2 mm), Weight:145 oz (145 g) | |||||
| 73.0 | ≈ | Color:/ /, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (65 mm) x 5.0 inches (128 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.8 mm), Weight:137 oz (137 g) | |||||
| 73.1 | ≈ | Color:ORANGE/WHITE/BLACK, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.5 inches (64 mm) x 5.0 inches (126 mm) x 0.4 inches (11.3 mm), Weight:138 oz (138 g) | |||||
| 79.3 | Color:/ / /, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.4 inches (61 mm) x 4.8 inches (123 mm) x 0.4 inches (10.4 mm), Weight:120 oz (120 g) | ||||||
screen cleanliness
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen cleanliness | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67.6 | - | Display type:NEW ASV, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:326 ppi | |||||
| 54.0 | Display type:CG Silicon, Screen resolution (width x height):540 x 960, Pixel density:268 ppi | ||||||
| 64.3 | ≈ | Display type:NEW ASV, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312 ppi | |||||
| 61.3 | Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:299 ppi | ||||||
| 67.6 | ≈ | Display type:NEW ASV, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:326 ppi | |||||
| 67.6 | ≈ | Display type:NEW ASV, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:326 ppi | |||||
| 67.6 | ≈ | Display type:CG Silicon, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:326 ppi | |||||
| 55.6 | Display type:New ASV, Screen resolution (width x height):540 x 960, Pixel density:275 ppi | ||||||
performance
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | - | OS:Android, Chipset:Texas Instruments OMAP4460, CPU specs:1.2GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 7.9 | ≈ | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960, CPU specs:1.5GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 7.9 | ≈ | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A, CPU specs:1.5GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 42.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064, CPU specs:1.5GHz×4(Quad core), RAM size:2GB | ||||||
| 7.9 | ≈ | OS:Android, Chipset:OMAP4460, CPU specs:1.5GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 4.1 | ≈ | OS:Android, Chipset:OMAP4430, CPU specs:1.0GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 7.9 | ≈ | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960, CPU specs:1.5GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:1GB | |||||
| 2.1 | ≈ | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon S2 MSM8255, CPU specs:1.5GHz×1(Single core), RAM size:512.0MB | |||||
SH-06D NERV docomo's specs
| SH-06D NERV docomo | ||||
| Image |  | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | ||||
| Brand | AQUOS | |||
| Release date | 6/29, 2012 | |||
| OS | Android | |||
| Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 2.6 inches (66 mm) x 5.0 inches (128 mm) x 0.5 inches (11.8 mm) | |||
| Weight | 145 oz (145 g) | |||
| Display size | 4.5 inch | |||
| Display type | NEW ASV | |||
| Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | |||
| Pixel density | 326 ppi | |||
| Battery capacity | 1520 mAh | |||
| Chipset | Texas Instruments OMAP4460 | |||
| CPU specs | 1.2GHz×2(Dual core) | |||
| RAM size | 1GB | |||
| Storage size | 8GB | |||
| Rear-camera resolution | 8 MP | |||
| Front-camera resolution | 0.3 MP | |||
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | ||||
