Review of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s. Thorough explanation of the pros and cons of its functions and specifications/performances
Created date: 09/05/2019, 19:48:26, Updated date: 04/15/2020, 10:06:43
A thorough review of the characteristics and specifications of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s. We provide a detailed evaluation of the phone in terms of usability – including ease of holding, screen visibility, performance, image quality, and multitasking capabilities – as well as functionality, looking at the battery and camera.
Summary of rating | Compare ratings with all 4403 smartphones |
|---|
| Assessment Items | Scores |
|---|---|
| Portability | 46/100 |
| Screen size | 91/100 |
| Screen clarity | 81/100 |
| Battery duration | 83/100 |
| Processing capability | 98/100 |
| Multitasking | 99/100 |
| Camera function | 86/100 |
Contents
- 1.The merits and demerits of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
- 2.Features, Performance, and Reviews for the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
- 2-1.ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s's size
- 2-2.The CPU performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
- 2-3.ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s's storage capacity
- 2-4.ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s's screen
- 2-5.The camera function of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
- 2-6.The battery performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
- 2-7.Overall assessment of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
- 3.Specifications of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
Features, Performance, and Reviews for the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s's size
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s is 3.1 inches (78.5 mm) wide, 6.8 inches (171.7 mm) tall, and 0.4 inches (9.7 mm) thick. The size makes it a bit difficult to use with one hand. In the case of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s, it weighs about 215 oz (215 g). The phone feels quite heavy when used one-handed. Even when used for short periods of time, some people will notice a bit of a strain. When used with both hands, however, the weight isn't as much of an issue.
In giving an overall rating to the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s, while it may be slightly difficult to hold, it shouldn't be much of a problem when considering its general strengths and weaknesses.
The CPU performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s has an extremely high processing power of 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), so it can smoothly run any app out there with ease. Its performance ranks among the top-class of all smartphones released to date. It's well suited to running even the most demanding of 3D games with ease.
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s has a very high RAM capacity at 12GB. There are few cases where the RAM capacity would be insufficient, so it is also well suited to multitasking. It's unlikely to feel slow even when switching between several different apps.
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s is an exceptional high-end smartphone. You will be fully content with its performance in all areas. It is a must-have for you if operation performance is important for you.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s's storage capacity
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s has 256GB of data storage, which is perfect for people who frequently take photos and videos. It is suited to taking both photos and videos, and is unlikely to feel inconvenient even with lots of apps or games installed.
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s is not compatible with SD cards, so make sure you check that there's enough storage for your needs.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s's screen
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s has a 6.65 inch screen. The smartphone has a large, impressive screen, which allows you to enjoy photos and videos to the fullest. It is also very good for writing business documents and doing other work.
The screen of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s is extremely clear, and it's able to display everything from images to videos and even video game graphics in perfect clarity.
The camera function of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s has an ultrahigh performance 48 MP main camera. This allows you to make high-quality photos and will rarely leave you wanting with regard to camera performance. This will make using your camera fun.
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s is equipped with a rather powerful 16 MP front camera. The photos turn out quite well since they don't look grainy even when you print them out.
The battery performance of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s has a battery with a quite large capacity of 5000 mAh. Compared to other smartphones, the battery life of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s is very good and will no doubt satisfy all your needs. You won't have to worry about the battery even when you use the phone to watch videos or play games for hours on end.
Overall assessment of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s is a high-performance smartphone. You're not likely to experience any inconvenience in general use.
The merits and demerits of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
The merits of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
- With the large display you can comfortably use it to watch videos and play games.
- Photos and videos are beautiful to look at on the clear screen.
- Because of its large battery capacity, it is good for hours of watching videos and playing games.
- It has a high performance CPU, meaning that even 3D games run smoothly.
- The extremely high-spec rear camera makes the phone great for taking photogenic and scenic shots.
- It has a somewhat high-spec front camera and is suitable for all your everyday photos.
The demerits of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
- no data
Comparing the specifications of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s against similar products
general rating
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | general rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 81.6 | - | Color:Mecha Silver/Cyber Shade/Eclipse Black, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78.5 mm) x 6.8 inches (171.7 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.7 mm), Weight:215 oz (215 g), Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:387 ppi, Display size:6.65 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+, CPU specs:2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:12GB, Storage size:256GB, Battery capacity:5000 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:48 MP, Front-camera resolution:16 MP | ||||
 | 78.3 | ≈ | Color:Black/Mars Red/Cyber Neon/Transparent, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78 mm) x 6.6 inches (168.6 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.8 mm), Weight:218 oz (218 g), Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:387 ppi, Display size:6.65 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865, CPU specs:2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:16GB, Storage size:256GB, Battery capacity:4500 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:64 MP, Front-camera resolution:8 MP | ||||
| 77.0 | ≈ | Color:Black/Blue, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78.5 mm) x 6.8 inches (171.7 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.1 mm), Weight:215 oz (215 g), Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:387 ppi, Display size:6.65 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G, CPU specs:2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:8GB, Storage size:256GB, Battery capacity:5100 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:48 MP, Front-camera resolution:12 MP | ||||
| 81.7 | ≈ | Color:Silver/Pulse, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78 mm) x 6.6 inches (168.6 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.8 mm), Weight:220 oz (220 g), Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:387 ppi, Display size:6.65 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865, CPU specs:2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:16GB, Storage size:256GB, Battery capacity:4500 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:64 MP, Front-camera resolution:8 MP | ||||
body size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.5 | - | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78.5 mm) x 6.8 inches (171.7 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.7 mm) | ||||
 | 51.0 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (74.9 mm) x 6.2 inches (158.1 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm) | |||||
 | 58.9 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (70.6 mm) x 5.8 inches (148 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm) | |||||
 | 51.8 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.5 mm) x 6.2 inches (158.7 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm) | |||||
 | 51.1 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.6 mm) x 6.3 inches (158.8 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.5 mm) | |||||
 | 56.2 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (72.7 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.5 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.5 mm) | |||||
 | 58.4 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71.2 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.5 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm) | |||||
 | 56.0 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (72.6 mm) x 6.0 inches (153 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm) | |||||
body weight
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body weight | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.8 | - | Weight:215 oz (215 g) | ||||
| 56.4 | Weight:185 oz (185 g) | |||||
| 69.1 | Weight:153 oz (153 g) | |||||
| 62.4 | Weight:170 oz (170 g) | |||||
| 54.4 | Weight:190 oz (190 g) | |||||
| 62.4 | Weight:170 oz (170 g) | |||||
| 68.4 | Weight:155 oz (155 g) | |||||
| 63.2 | Weight:168 oz (168 g) | |||||
screen size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91.1 | - | Display size:6.65 inch | ||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Display size:6 inch | ||||
| 85.2 | Display size:5.7 inch | |||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Display size:6.01 inch | ||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Display size:6.01 inch | ||||
| 85.7 | Display size:5.73 inch | |||||
| 77.2 | Display size:5.2 inch | |||||
| 82.0 | Display size:5.5 inch | |||||
screen resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75.3 | - | |||||
| 72.7 | ≈ | |||||
| 72.7 | ≈ | |||||
| 72.7 | ≈ | |||||
| 72.7 | ≈ | |||||
| 70.7 | ≈ | |||||
| 68.7 | ||||||
| 68.7 | ||||||
RAM capacity
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | RAM capacity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 99.0 | - | RAM size:12GB | ||||
| 93.4 | RAM size:8GB | |||||
| 90.0 | RAM size:6GB | |||||
| 70.0 | RAM size:4GB | |||||
| 70.0 | RAM size:4GB | |||||
| 93.4 | RAM size:8GB | |||||
| 90.0 | RAM size:6GB | |||||
| 90.0 | RAM size:6GB | |||||
storage size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | storage size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91.5 | - | Storage size:256GB | ||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Storage size:128GB | ||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Storage size:128GB | ||||
| 67.0 | Storage size:64GB | |||||
| 67.0 | Storage size:64GB | |||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Storage size:128GB | ||||
| 67.0 | Storage size:64GB | |||||
| 67.0 | Storage size:64GB | |||||
battery
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | battery | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.0 | - | Battery capacity:5000 mAh | ||||
| 77.0 | Battery capacity:3800 mAh | |||||
| 71.8 | Battery capacity:3450 mAh | |||||
| 80.0 | ≈ | Battery capacity:4000 mAh | ||||
| 83.0 | ≈ | Battery capacity:5000 mAh | ||||
| 66.5 | Battery capacity:3100 mAh | |||||
| 68.0 | Battery capacity:3200 mAh | |||||
| 68.0 | Battery capacity:3200 mAh | |||||
rear-camera resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | rear-camera resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 97.8 | - | Rear-camera resolution:48 MP | ||||
| 87.6 | Rear-camera resolution:24 MP | |||||
| 87.6 | Rear-camera resolution:24 MP | |||||
| 61.7 | Rear-camera resolution:13 MP | |||||
| 68.8 | Rear-camera resolution:16 MP | |||||
| 85.3 | Rear-camera resolution:23 MP | |||||
| 61.7 | Rear-camera resolution:13 MP | |||||
| 61.7 | Rear-camera resolution:13 MP | |||||
front-camera resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | front-camera resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75.4 | - | Front-camera resolution:16 MP | ||||
| 58.3 | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 58.3 | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 58.3 | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 75.4 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:16 MP | ||||
| 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | |||||
| 75.4 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:16 MP | ||||
| 75.4 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:16 MP | ||||
grip
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | grip | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.2 | - | Color:Mecha Silver/Cyber Shade/Eclipse Black, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78.5 mm) x 6.8 inches (171.7 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.7 mm), Weight:215 oz (215 g) | ||||
| 53.7 | Color:Black/Red/Flame Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (74.9 mm) x 6.2 inches (158.1 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm), Weight:185 oz (185 g) | |||||
| 64.0 | Color:Provence Edition/Ying Yu powder/Celadon blue/Diamond black/Glacier White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (70.6 mm) x 5.8 inches (148 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm), Weight:153 oz (153 g) | |||||
| 57.1 | Color:Black/Gold/Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.5 mm) x 6.2 inches (158.7 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm), Weight:170 oz (170 g) | |||||
| 52.8 | Color:Obsidian Black/Space Gold/Nebula Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.6 mm) x 6.3 inches (158.8 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.5 mm), Weight:190 oz (190 g) | |||||
| 59.3 | Color:Aurora Blue/Black Gold, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (72.7 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.5 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.5 mm), Weight:170 oz (170 g) | |||||
| 63.4 | Color:Black Gold/Deep Blue/Aegean Blue, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71.2 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.5 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm), Weight:155 oz (155 g) | |||||
| 59.6 | Color:Black/Black+Gold/Blue, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (72.6 mm) x 6.0 inches (153 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm), Weight:168 oz (168 g) | |||||
screen cleanliness
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen cleanliness | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.9 | - | Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:387 ppi | ||||
| 84.9 | ≈ | Display type:LTPS IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2160, Pixel density:402 ppi | ||||
| 85.5 | ≈ | Display type:LTPS IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2160, Pixel density:423 ppi | ||||
| 84.9 | ≈ | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2160, Pixel density:401 ppi | ||||
| 84.9 | ≈ | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2160, Pixel density:401 ppi | ||||
| 84.9 | ≈ | Display type:LTPS IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2040, Pixel density:402 ppi | ||||
| 85.5 | ≈ | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:423 ppi | ||||
| 85.0 | ≈ | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:400 ppi | ||||
performance
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98.9 | - | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+, CPU specs:2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:12GB | ||||
| 93.3 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835, CPU specs:2.35GHz+1.9GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:8GB | |||||
| 90.1 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660, CPU specs:2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:6GB | |||||
| 89.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625, CPU specs:2.0GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:4GB | |||||
| 89.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625, CPU specs:2.0GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:4GB | |||||
| 93.7 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835, CPU specs:2.45GHz+1.9GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:8GB | |||||
| 88.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8976 Pro Snapdragon 653, CPU specs:1.95GHz+1.4GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:6GB | |||||
| 88.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8976 Pro Snapdragon 653, CPU specs:1.95GHz+1.4GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:6GB | |||||
Specifications of ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s
| ZTE nubia Red Magic 3s | ||||
| Image | | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | ZTE | |||
| Release date | 9, 2019 | |||
| Color | Mecha Silver/Cyber Shade/Eclipse Black | |||
| OS | Android | |||
| Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 3.1 inches (78.5 mm) x 6.8 inches (171.7 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.7 mm) | |||
| Weight | 215 oz (215 g) | |||
| Display size | 6.65 inch | |||
| Display type | AMOLED | |||
| Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | |||
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | |||
| Battery capacity | 5000 mAh | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ | |||
| CPU specs | 2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore) | |||
| RAM size | 12GB | |||
| Storage size | 256GB | |||
| Rear-camera resolution | 48 MP | |||
| Front-camera resolution | 16 MP | |||
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | ||||
