We reviewed the ease-of-use of the Galaxy S20+ 5G. We review how highly we recommend this device.
Created date: 02/10/2020, 06:55:50, Updated date: 04/04/2020, 14:13:25
We provided an in-depth evaluation of the Galaxy S20+ 5G's features. We thoroughly reviewed its strengths and weaknesses. Here, we consolidated our thoughts on whether you should get the Galaxy S20+ 5G.
Summary of rating | Compare ratings with all 3915 smartphones |
|---|
| Assessment Items | Scores |
|---|---|
| Portability | 53/100 |
| Screen size | 91/100 |
| Screen clarity | 88/100 |
| Battery duration | 81/100 |
| Processing capability | 98/100 |
| Multitasking | 99/100 |
| Camera function | 82/100 |
Features, Performance, and Reviews for the Galaxy S20+ 5G
The CPU performance of Galaxy S20+ 5G
The Galaxy S20+ 5G has an extremely high processing power of 2.73GHz+2.5GHz+2.0GHz×8.0(OctaCore), so it can smoothly run any app out there with ease. Its performance ranks among the top-class of all smartphones released to date. It's well suited to running even the most demanding of 3D games with ease.
The Galaxy S20+ 5G has a very high RAM capacity at 12 GB. There are few cases where the RAM capacity would be insufficient, so it is also well suited to multitasking. It's unlikely to feel slow even when switching between several different apps.
The Galaxy S20+ 5G is an exceptional high-end smartphone. You will be fully content with its performance in all areas. It is a must-have for you if operation performance is important for you.
Galaxy S20+ 5G's storage capacity
The Galaxy S20+ 5G has 512 GB of data storage, which is perfect for people who frequently take photos and videos. It is suited to taking both photos and videos, and is unlikely to feel inconvenient even with lots of apps or games installed.
Since the Galaxy S20+ 5G is compatible with SD cards, you'll be able to easily expand your storage capacity; you won't need to worry about how much internal space it has.
The camera function of Galaxy S20+ 5G
The Galaxy S20+ 5G has an ultrahigh performance 64 MP main camera. This allows you to make high-quality photos and will rarely leave you wanting with regard to camera performance. This will make using your camera fun.
The Galaxy S20+ 5G is equipped with a rather powerful 10 MP front camera. The photos turn out quite well since they don't look grainy even when you print them out.
The battery performance of Galaxy S20+ 5G
The Galaxy S20+ 5G has a battery with a quite large capacity of 4500 mAh.Compared to other smartphones, the battery life of the Galaxy S20+ 5G is very good and will no doubt satisfy all your needs. You won't have to worry about the battery even when you use the phone to watch videos or play games for hours on end.
Galaxy S20+ 5G's size
The Galaxy S20+ 5G is 29.0 in (73.7 mm) wide, 63.7 in (161.9 mm) tall, and 3.1 in (7.8 mm) thick.I can just barely use it with one hand, so it may feel big to some people.In the case of the Galaxy S20+ 5G, it weighs about 6.6 oz (188 g).It feels a little heavy when held with one hand. It may tire your hand out if you operate it for too long a time.
In giving an overall rating to the Galaxy S20+ 5G, while it may be slightly difficult to hold, it shouldn't be much of a problem when considering its general strengths and weaknesses.
Galaxy S20+ 5G's screen
The Galaxy S20+ 5G has a 6.7 inch screen.The smartphone has a large, impressive screen, which allows you to enjoy photos and videos to the fullest. It is also very good for writing business documents and doing other work.
The screen of the Galaxy S20+ 5G is extremely clear, and it's able to display everything from images to videos and even video game graphics in perfect clarity.
Overall assessment of Galaxy S20+ 5G
The Galaxy S20+ 5G is a high-performance smartphone. You're not likely to experience any inconvenience in general use.
The merits and demerits of Galaxy S20+ 5G
The merits of Galaxy S20+ 5G
- With the large display you can comfortably use it to watch videos and play games.
- Photos and videos are beautiful to look at on the clear screen.
- Because of its large battery capacity, it is good for hours of watching videos and playing games.
- It has a high performance CPU, meaning that even 3D games run smoothly.
- The extremely high-spec rear camera makes the phone great for taking photogenic and scenic shots.
The demerits of Galaxy S20+ 5G
- no data
Comparing the specifications of Galaxy S20+ 5G against similar products.
general rating
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | general rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 69.0 | - | ||||
| Galaxy A10s | 52.1 | |||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 58.7 | |||||
| Galaxy A01 | 45.6 | |||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 57.1 | |||||
| Galaxy S10 Lite | 70.1 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy Xcover Pro | 64.1 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G | 68.8 | ≈ | ||||
body size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | body size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 50.9 | - | ||||
| Galaxy A10s | 51.6 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy A20s | 33.1 | |||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 0.0 | |||||
| Galaxy A51 | 52.9 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy A71 | 44.9 | |||||
| Galaxy A01 | 67.4 | |||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 18.8 | |||||
body weight
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | body weight | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 9.5 | - | ||||
| Galaxy A10s | 29.6 | |||||
| Galaxy A20s | 14.3 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 0.0 | |||||
| Galaxy A51 | 25.4 | |||||
| Galaxy A71 | 18.3 | |||||
| Galaxy A01 | 51.0 | |||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 0.0 | |||||
screen size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | screen size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 97.8 | - | ||||
| Galaxy A10s | 89.8 | |||||
| Galaxy A20s | 97.8 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 54.1 | |||||
| Galaxy A51 | 97.8 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy A71 | 97.8 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy A01 | 74.4 | |||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 97.8 | ≈ | ||||
RAM capacity
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | RAM capacity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 98.0 | - | ||||
| Galaxy A10s | 61.9 | |||||
| Galaxy A20s | 74.5 | |||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 74.5 | |||||
| Galaxy A51 | 97.8 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy A71 | 97.8 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy A01 | 44.1 | |||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 97.8 | ≈ | ||||
storage size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | storage size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 98.0 | - | ||||
| Galaxy A10s | 55.3 | |||||
| Galaxy A20s | 71.1 | |||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 71.1 | |||||
| Galaxy A51 | 86.8 | |||||
| Galaxy A71 | 86.8 | |||||
| Galaxy A01 | 39.5 | |||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 86.8 | |||||
battery
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | battery | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 97.9 | - | ||||
| Galaxy A10s | 91.3 | |||||
| Galaxy A20s | 91.3 | |||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 97.9 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy A51 | 91.3 | |||||
| Galaxy A71 | 97.9 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy A01 | 57.3 | |||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 97.9 | ≈ | ||||
rear-camera resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | rear-camera resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 98.5 | - | ||||
| Galaxy A10s | 46.6 | |||||
| Galaxy A20s | 46.6 | |||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 40.7 | |||||
| Galaxy A51 | 98.2 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy A71 | 98.5 | ≈ | ||||
| Galaxy A01 | 46.6 | |||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 40.7 | |||||
front-camera resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | front-camera resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 54.1 | - | ||||
| Galaxy A10s | 41.7 | |||||
| Galaxy A20s | 41.7 | |||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 41.7 | |||||
| Galaxy A51 | 98.0 | |||||
| Galaxy A71 | 98.0 | |||||
| Galaxy A01 | 15.5 | |||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 98.0 | |||||
grip
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | grip | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 54.0 | - | Color:Cosmic Black/Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cloud White/Aura Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):29.0 in (73.7 mm) x 63.7 in (161.9 mm) x 3.1 in (7.8 mm), Weight:6.6 oz (188 g) | |||
| Galaxy A10s | 57.6 | ≈ | Color:Blue/Green/Red/Black, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):29.8 in (75.8 mm) x 61.8 in (156.9 mm) x 3.1 in (7.8 mm), Weight:5.9 oz (168 g) | |||
| Galaxy A20s | 53.0 | ≈ | Color:Black/Blue/Red/Green, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):30.5 in (77.5 mm) x 64.3 in (163.3 mm) x 3.1 in (8 mm), Weight:6.5 oz (183 g) | |||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 43.4 | Color:Black, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):31.8 in (80.7 mm) x 62.4 in (158.5 mm) x 5.6 in (14.2 mm), Weight:9.0 oz (256 g) | ||||
| Galaxy A51 | 57.5 | ≈ | Color:Prism Crush Black/White/Blue/Pink, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):29.0 in (73.6 mm) x 62.4 in (158.5 mm) x 3.1 in (7.9 mm), Weight:6.1 oz (172 g) | |||
| Galaxy A71 | 54.6 | ≈ | Color:Prism/Crush Black/Silver/Blue/Pink, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):29.9 in (76 mm) x 64.4 in (163.6 mm) x 3.0 in (7.7 mm), Weight:6.3 oz (179 g) | |||
| Galaxy A01 | 64.5 | Color:Black/Blue/Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):27.9 in (70.9 mm) x 57.6 in (146.2 mm) x 3.3 in (8.3 mm), Weight:5.3 oz (149 g) | ||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 50.0 | ≈ | Color:Aura Glow/Aura Black/Aura Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):30.0 in (76.1 mm) x 64.4 in (163.7 mm) x 3.4 in (8.7 mm), Weight:7.0 oz (199 g) | |||
screen cleanliness
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | screen cleanliness | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 88.2 | - | Display type:Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Screen resolution (width x height):1440 x 3200, Pixel density:523ppi | |||
| Galaxy A10s | 54.7 | Display type:PLS TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1520, Pixel density:271ppi | ||||
| Galaxy A20s | 53.0 | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1560, Pixel density:264ppi | ||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 89.6 | ≈ | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1440 x 2560, Pixel density:575ppi | |||
| Galaxy A51 | 85.0 | ≈ | Display type:Super AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2400, Pixel density:404ppi | |||
| Galaxy A71 | 83.1 | Display type:Super AMOLED Plus, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2400, Pixel density:392ppi | ||||
| Galaxy A01 | 60.3 | Display type:PLS TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1520, Pixel density:295ppi | ||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 83.1 | Display type:Super AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2400, Pixel density:392ppi | ||||
screen quality
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | screen quality | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 90.7 | - | Display size:6.7 inch, Display type:Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Screen resolution (width x height):1440 x 3200, Pixel density:523ppi | |||
| Galaxy A10s | 76.5 | Display size:6.2 inch, Display type:PLS TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1520, Pixel density:271ppi | ||||
| Galaxy A20s | 77.7 | Display size:6.5 inch, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1560, Pixel density:264ppi | ||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 80.8 | Display size:5.1 inch, Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1440 x 2560, Pixel density:575ppi | ||||
| Galaxy A51 | 86.8 | ≈ | Display size:6.5 inch, Display type:Super AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2400, Pixel density:404ppi | |||
| Galaxy A71 | 87.9 | ≈ | Display size:6.7 inch, Display type:Super AMOLED Plus, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2400, Pixel density:392ppi | |||
| Galaxy A01 | 76.0 | Display size:5.7 inch, Display type:PLS TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1520, Pixel density:295ppi | ||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 87.9 | ≈ | Display size:6.7 inch, Display type:Super AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2400, Pixel density:392ppi | |||
performance
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two. | performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | 98.0 | - | OS:Android | |||
| Galaxy A10s | 62.0 | OS:Android | ||||
| Galaxy A20s | 80.1 | OS:Android | ||||
| Galaxy Xcover FieldPro | 76.8 | OS:Android | ||||
| Galaxy A51 | 94.2 | ≈ | OS:Android | |||
| Galaxy A71 | 98.0 | ≈ | OS:Android | |||
| Galaxy A01 | 56.6 | OS:Android | ||||
| Galaxy Note10 Lite | 97.8 | ≈ | OS:Android | |||
Specifications of Galaxy S20+ 5G
| Galaxy S20+ 5G | ||||
| Image |  | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | Samsung | |||
| Release date | 3/6, 2020 | |||
| Color | Cosmic Black/Cosmic Grey/Cloud Blue/Cloud White/Aura Red | |||
| OS | Android | |||
| Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 29.0 in (73.7 mm) x 63.7 in (161.9 mm) x 3.1 in (7.8 mm) | |||
| Weight | 6.6 oz (188 g) | |||
| Display size | 6.7 inch | |||
| Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |||
| Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 3200 | |||
| Pixel density | 523ppi | |||
| Battery capacity | 4500 mAh | |||
| Chipset | Exynos 990 | |||
| CPU specs | 2.73GHz+2.5GHz+2.0GHz×8.0(OctaCore) | |||
| RAM size | 12 GB | |||
| Storage size | 512 GB | |||
| Rear-camera resolution | 64 MP | |||
| Front-camera resolution | 10 MP | |||
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | ||||
