Review of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G. Thorough explanation of the pros and cons of its functions and specifications/performances
Created date: 03/11/2020, 10:45:48, Updated date: 04/16/2020, 13:04:40
We've conducted a detailed review of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G, looking into its battery, how easy it is to use the camera, and whether the CPU performance is high or low. Not only that, but we've also evaluated how portable and easy to hold it is, as well as how nice the display is.
Summary of rating | Compare ratings with all 4149 smartphones |
|---|
| Aspect | Score |
|---|---|
| Grip | 46/100 |
| Screen size | 91/100 |
| Screen quality | 81/100 |
| Battery life | 81/100 |
| CPU specs | 98/100 |
| Multi-tasking | 100/100 |
| Camera specs | 79/100 |
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G's features, performance, reviews
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G's camera specs
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G has a 64 MP main camera, which is an extremely high figure. As this camera can take very high-quality photos, you will rarely feel frustrated with the quality. You can comfortably rely on this smartphone's camera.
Also, ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G has an 8 MP front camera, which is an average figure for a smartphone camera. It is good enough for taking selfies, but you may be a little dissatisfied when you need to take a group photo or print your photos.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G's battery performance
The battery performance of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G is 4500 mAh, and which is an unusually large capacity. Compared to other smartphones, the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G has an unusually long battery life. At this amount you will be sufficiently pleased with the battery life. Even if you watch movies for a long time or play games, you will not have much trouble with the battery.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G's size
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G has a width of 3.1 inches (78 mm), a length of 6.6 inches (168.6 mm), and a thickness of 0.4 inches (9.8 mm). At this size it would feel a bit difficult to operate with one hand. In addition, the weight of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G is about 218 oz (218 g). It feels heavy when holding it in one hand. Depending on the person you might feel tired of the heaviness. However, if you operate it with both hands, the weight is not a burden.
Assessing the overall ease of holding the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G, it has some difficulties but if you use it based on its strengths and weaknesses it will not cause many issues.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G's screen
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G has a 6.65 inch display. It is fairly large and has a good presence. Photos, videos, and games will really enjoy this screen estate. It is also suited for productivity use such as creating a business document.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G has a very high-quality screen and any graphical content that you enjoy, including videos and games, will be displayed clearly.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G's CPU specs
With the 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore) for processing power, the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G has extremely high performance and will operate smoothly without stress, whichever app you use. Among all smartphones released to date, it is one with top class performance. It is also suitable for heavier 3D games, and quite smooth play will be possible.
With a huge 16GB of RAM, the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G has an extremely large amount. Cases of insufficient RAM almost never occur, so it is further suited for multitasking as well. Even with frequent switching between multiple apps you are unlikely to feel any sluggishness.
Evaluating the overall speed of operation of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G, it is a really fantastic high-end smartphone, and in terms of performance can be used without stress in all usage scenarios. If choosing a smartphone for performance in operation, it is highly recommended.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G's storage size
The data storage capacity of the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G is 256GB and it is highly recommended for people who frequently take movies and images. It is suitable for filming movies and photography, and you even if you install many games and apps you will not feel inconvenienced.
Since the ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G does not support SD cards, you need to be careful enough that you have enough capacity.
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G's general rating
The ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G is a high-performance smartphone when viewed comprehensively. It works for everyday use with hardly any inconvenience.
Advantages and disadvantages of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G
Advantages of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G
- The display is very large, so it is perfect for watching videos or playing games.
- The screen quality is very high, and pictures and videos appear crisp.
- It has a long battery life, so it is suited for watching videos or playing games for an extended period of time.
- It has a high-grade CPU, so you can play 3D games without encountering stuttering.
- It has an extremely high-grade rear camera, so you can take Instagrammable pictures or landscape photography.
Disadvantages of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G
- no data
Comparing the specifications of ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G against similar products
general rating
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | general rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.5 | - | Color:Black/Mars Red/Cyber Neon/Transparent, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78 mm) x 6.6 inches (168.6 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.8 mm), Weight:218 oz (218 g), Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:387 ppi, Display size:6.65 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865, CPU specs:2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:16GB, Storage size:256GB, Battery capacity:4500 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:64 MP, Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 80.7 | ≈ | Color:Twilight Blue/Diamond Black, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.3 mm) x 6.2 inches (158.6 mm) x 0.4 inches (9 mm), Weight:186 oz (186 g), Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:401 ppi, Display size:6.42 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+, CPU specs:2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.78GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:8GB, Storage size:512GB, Battery capacity:4000 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:48 MP | |||||
| 82.0 | ≈ | Color:Mecha Silver/Cyber Shade/Eclipse Black, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78.5 mm) x 6.8 inches (171.7 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.7 mm), Weight:215 oz (215 g), Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:387 ppi, Display size:6.65 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+, CPU specs:2.96GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:12GB, Storage size:256GB, Battery capacity:5000 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:48 MP, Front-camera resolution:16 MP | |||||
| 77.1 | ≈ | Color:Black/Blue, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78.5 mm) x 6.8 inches (171.7 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.1 mm), Weight:215 oz (215 g), Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:387 ppi, Display size:6.65 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SDM765 Snapdragon 765G, CPU specs:2.4GHz+2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:8GB, Storage size:256GB, Battery capacity:5100 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:48 MP, Front-camera resolution:12 MP | |||||
| 82.1 | ≈ | Color:Silver/Blue+Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78 mm) x 6.6 inches (168.6 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.8 mm), Weight:220 oz (220 g), Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:387 ppi, Display size:6.65 inch, OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865, CPU specs:2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:16GB, Storage size:256GB, Battery capacity:4500 mAh, Rear-camera resolution:64 MP, Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
body size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.5 | - | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78 mm) x 6.6 inches (168.6 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.8 mm) | |||||
| 51.0 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (74.9 mm) x 6.2 inches (158.1 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm) | ||||||
| 58.9 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (70.6 mm) x 5.8 inches (148 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm) | ||||||
| 51.8 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.5 mm) x 6.2 inches (158.7 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm) | ||||||
| 51.1 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.6 mm) x 6.3 inches (158.8 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.5 mm) | ||||||
| 56.2 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (72.7 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.5 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.5 mm) | ||||||
| 58.4 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71.2 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.5 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm) | ||||||
| 56.0 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (72.6 mm) x 6.0 inches (153 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm) | ||||||
body weight
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body weight | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.4 | - | Weight:218 oz (218 g) | |||||
| 56.4 | Weight:185 oz (185 g) | ||||||
| 69.1 | Weight:153 oz (153 g) | ||||||
| 62.4 | Weight:170 oz (170 g) | ||||||
| 54.4 | Weight:190 oz (190 g) | ||||||
| 62.4 | Weight:170 oz (170 g) | ||||||
| 68.4 | Weight:155 oz (155 g) | ||||||
| 63.2 | Weight:168 oz (168 g) | ||||||
screen size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91.1 | - | Display size:6.65 inch | |||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Display size:6 inch | |||||
| 85.2 | Display size:5.7 inch | ||||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Display size:6.01 inch | |||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Display size:6.01 inch | |||||
| 85.7 | Display size:5.73 inch | ||||||
| 77.2 | Display size:5.2 inch | ||||||
| 82.0 | Display size:5.5 inch | ||||||
RAM capacity
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | RAM capacity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100.0 | - | RAM size:16GB | |||||
| 93.4 | RAM size:8GB | ||||||
| 90.0 | RAM size:6GB | ||||||
| 70.0 | RAM size:4GB | ||||||
| 70.0 | RAM size:4GB | ||||||
| 93.4 | RAM size:8GB | ||||||
| 90.0 | RAM size:6GB | ||||||
| 90.0 | RAM size:6GB | ||||||
storage size
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | storage size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91.5 | - | Storage size:256GB | |||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Storage size:128GB | |||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Storage size:128GB | |||||
| 67.0 | Storage size:64GB | ||||||
| 67.0 | Storage size:64GB | ||||||
| 90.0 | ≈ | Storage size:128GB | |||||
| 67.0 | Storage size:64GB | ||||||
| 67.0 | Storage size:64GB | ||||||
battery
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | battery | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.5 | - | Battery capacity:4500 mAh | |||||
| 77.0 | ≈ | Battery capacity:3800 mAh | |||||
| 71.8 | Battery capacity:3450 mAh | ||||||
| 80.0 | ≈ | Battery capacity:4000 mAh | |||||
| 83.0 | ≈ | Battery capacity:5000 mAh | |||||
| 66.5 | Battery capacity:3100 mAh | ||||||
| 68.0 | Battery capacity:3200 mAh | ||||||
| 68.0 | Battery capacity:3200 mAh | ||||||
rear-camera resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | rear-camera resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100.0 | - | Rear-camera resolution:64 MP | |||||
| 87.6 | Rear-camera resolution:24 MP | ||||||
| 87.6 | Rear-camera resolution:24 MP | ||||||
| 61.7 | Rear-camera resolution:13 MP | ||||||
| 68.8 | Rear-camera resolution:16 MP | ||||||
| 85.3 | Rear-camera resolution:23 MP | ||||||
| 61.7 | Rear-camera resolution:13 MP | ||||||
| 61.7 | Rear-camera resolution:13 MP | ||||||
front-camera resolution
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | front-camera resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.3 | - | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 58.3 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 58.3 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 58.3 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
| 75.4 | Front-camera resolution:16 MP | ||||||
| 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | ||||||
| 75.4 | Front-camera resolution:16 MP | ||||||
| 75.4 | Front-camera resolution:16 MP | ||||||
grip
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | grip | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.5 | - | Color:Black/Mars Red/Cyber Neon/Transparent, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78 mm) x 6.6 inches (168.6 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.8 mm), Weight:218 oz (218 g) | |||||
| 53.7 | Color:Black/Red/Flame Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (74.9 mm) x 6.2 inches (158.1 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm), Weight:185 oz (185 g) | ||||||
| 64.0 | Color:Provence Edition/Ying Yu powder/Celadon blue/Diamond black/Glacier White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (70.6 mm) x 5.8 inches (148 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm), Weight:153 oz (153 g) | ||||||
| 57.1 | Color:Black/Gold/Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.5 mm) x 6.2 inches (158.7 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.8 mm), Weight:170 oz (170 g) | ||||||
| 52.8 | Color:Obsidian Black/Space Gold/Nebula Red, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75.6 mm) x 6.3 inches (158.8 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.5 mm), Weight:190 oz (190 g) | ||||||
| 59.3 | Color:Aurora Blue/Black Gold, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (72.7 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.5 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.5 mm), Weight:170 oz (170 g) | ||||||
| 63.4 | Color:Black Gold/Deep Blue/Aegean Blue, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71.2 mm) x 5.8 inches (147.5 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm), Weight:155 oz (155 g) | ||||||
| 59.6 | Color:Black/Black+Gold/Blue, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (72.6 mm) x 6.0 inches (153 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm), Weight:168 oz (168 g) | ||||||
screen cleanliness
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen cleanliness | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.9 | - | Display type:AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2340, Pixel density:387 ppi | |||||
| 84.9 | ≈ | Display type:LTPS IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2160, Pixel density:402 ppi | |||||
| 85.5 | ≈ | Display type:LTPS IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2160, Pixel density:423 ppi | |||||
| 84.9 | ≈ | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2160, Pixel density:401 ppi | |||||
| 84.9 | ≈ | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2160, Pixel density:401 ppi | |||||
| 84.9 | ≈ | Display type:LTPS IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 2040, Pixel density:402 ppi | |||||
| 85.5 | ≈ | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:423 ppi | |||||
| 85.0 | ≈ | Display type:IPS LCD, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:400 ppi | |||||
performance
| Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98.4 | - | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865, CPU specs:2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:16GB | |||||
| 93.3 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835, CPU specs:2.35GHz+1.9GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:8GB | ||||||
| 90.1 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660, CPU specs:2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:6GB | ||||||
| 89.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625, CPU specs:2.0GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:4GB | ||||||
| 89.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625, CPU specs:2.0GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:4GB | ||||||
| 93.7 | ≈ | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835, CPU specs:2.45GHz+1.9GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:8GB | |||||
| 88.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8976 Pro Snapdragon 653, CPU specs:1.95GHz+1.4GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:6GB | ||||||
| 88.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Qualcomm MSM8976 Pro Snapdragon 653, CPU specs:1.95GHz+1.4GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:6GB | ||||||
ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G's specs
| ZTE nubia Red Magic 5G | ||||
| Image |  | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maker | ZTE | |||
| Release date | 3/19, 2020 | |||
| Color | Black/Mars Red/Cyber Neon/Transparent | |||
| OS | Android | |||
| Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 3.1 inches (78 mm) x 6.6 inches (168.6 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.8 mm) | |||
| Weight | 218 oz (218 g) | |||
| Display size | 6.65 inch | |||
| Display type | AMOLED | |||
| Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2340 | |||
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | |||
| Battery capacity | 4500 mAh | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 | |||
| CPU specs | 2.84GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(OctaCore) | |||
| RAM size | 16GB | |||
| Storage size | 256GB | |||
| Rear-camera resolution | 64 MP | |||
| Front-camera resolution | 8 MP | |||
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | ||||
