TONE freebit PandA 5.5 Photos, Specs, and Reviews
Created date: 02/24/2018, 21:18:51, Updated date: 09/30/2018, 12:18:51
We've conducted a detailed review of the TONE freebit PandA 5.5, looking into its battery, how easy it is to use the camera, and whether the CPU performance is high or low. Not only that, but we've also evaluated how portable and easy to hold it is, as well as how nice the display is.
Summary of rating | Compare ratings with all 4356 smartphones |
---|
Assessment Items | Scores |
---|---|
Portability | 52/100 |
Screen size | 82/100 |
Screen clarity | 27/100 |
Battery duration | 57/100 |
Processing capability | 16/100 |
Multitasking | 20/100 |
Camera function | 32/100 |
Contents
- 1.The merits and demerits of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
- 2.Features, Performance, and Reviews for the TONE freebit PandA 5.5
- 2-1.TONE freebit PandA 5.5's size
- 2-2.The CPU performance of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
- 2-3.TONE freebit PandA 5.5's storage capacity
- 2-4.TONE freebit PandA 5.5's screen
- 2-5.The camera function of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
- 2-6.The battery performance of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
- 2-7.Overall assessment of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
- 3.Specifications of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
Features, Performance, and Reviews for the TONE freebit PandA 5.5
TONE freebit PandA 5.5's size
The TONE freebit PandA 5.5 is 3.1 inches (78 mm) wide, 5.9 inches (151 mm) tall, and 0.4 inches (9.5 mm) thick. The size makes it a bit difficult to use with one hand. In the case of the TONE freebit PandA 5.5, it weighs about 189 oz (189 g). It feels a little heavy when held with one hand. It may tire your hand out if you operate it for too long a time.
In giving an overall rating to the TONE freebit PandA 5.5, while it may be slightly difficult to hold, it shouldn't be much of a problem when considering its general strengths and weaknesses.
TONE freebit PandA 5.5's screen
The TONE freebit PandA 5.5 has a 5.5 inch screen. The smartphone has a large, impressive screen, which allows you to enjoy photos and videos to the fullest. It is also very good for writing business documents and doing other work.
The screen quality of the TONE freebit PandA 5.5 is such that videos and images can be blurry at times. There's a noticeable lack of image quality in general.
The CPU performance of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
The processing power of the TONE freebit PandA 5.5 is comparatively low at 1.3GHz×4(Quad core). You'll most likely notice its lack of power when running games or playing videos. However, you shouldn't have any problems making calls, browsing the internet or using apps like Twitter or Instagram.
The TONE freebit PandA 5.5 only has 1GB of RAM, which is fairly low. The RAM is regularly insufficient, so operation gets unstable and jerky even when using apps that are not resource intensive.
In rating the TONE freebit PandA 5.5's overall operational speed, it ranks at the low end of smartphones. It will lag and feel sluggish even during normal use. In most cases, users will feel the performance to be lacking.
TONE freebit PandA 5.5's storage capacity
The TONE freebit PandA 5.5 has 4GB of data storage. This is fine if you mainly use email or social media sites, but if you plan to take photos and videos or play games, you should buy an upgrade.
Since the TONE freebit PandA 5.5 is compatible with SD cards, you'll be able to easily expand your storage capacity; you won't need to worry about how much internal space it has.
The camera function of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
The main camera of the TONE freebit PandA 5.5 has a capacity of 8 MP pixels, and is adequate for normal use. But some users may feel dissatisfied with the picture quality.
The TONE freebit PandA 5.5 comes equipped with a 2 MP pixel front-facing camera, which is very low resolution. If you aren't particular about your videos or photos, it might be fine, but otherwise, we recommend a smartphone at least one tier higher.
The battery performance of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
The TONE freebit PandA 5.5's battery capacity is 2500 mAh, a standard level for these types of phones. Compared to other smartphones, the TONE freebit PandA 5.5 has a standard battery life. It should not be a problem for normal use. However, if you spend a lot of time online or playing games, you may find the battery life a bit dissatisfying.
Overall assessment of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
The TONE freebit PandA 5.5's performance level is that of a budget smartphone. It's a bit too weak to use as a main smartphone, so if possible you should consider something slightly more powerful. However, it should be sufficient for people that only want to use the most basic functions, like making calls and browsing the internet, and for people that don't really use smartphones much.
The merits and demerits of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
The merits of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
- With the large display you can comfortably use it to watch videos and play games.
The demerits of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
- The image quality on the screen is not good.
- The CPU performance is not very good, and will become operationally sluggish when using apps.
- The rear-facing camera is very low resolution, so you should not think of using this smartphone as your main camera.
Comparing the specifications of TONE freebit PandA 5.5 against similar products
body size
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
49.8 | - | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm) | |||||
54.0 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75 mm) x 5.8 inches (148 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.6 mm) | |||||
49.8 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm) | |||||
66.2 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.1 inches (130 mm) x 0.4 inches (11.3 mm) | ||||||
76.5 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.4 inches (60 mm) x 4.8 inches (122 mm) x 0.5 inches (11.9 mm) | ||||||
65.1 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.2 inches (133 mm) x 0.4 inches (10.7 mm) | ||||||
81.5 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.2 inches (56 mm) x 4.6 inches (117 mm) x 0.5 inches (13.4 mm) | ||||||
82.1 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.3 inches (58 mm) x 4.5 inches (115 mm) x 0.5 inches (12 mm) |
body weight
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body weight | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
54.8 | - | Weight:189 oz (189 g) | |||||
64.4 | Weight:165 oz (165 g) | ||||||
54.8 | ≈ | Weight:189 oz (189 g) | |||||
73.5 | Weight:142 oz (142 g) | ||||||
82.7 | Weight:119 oz (119 g) | ||||||
72.3 | Weight:145 oz (145 g) | ||||||
77.1 | Weight:133 oz (133 g) | ||||||
83.9 | Weight:116 oz (116 g) |
screen size
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.0 | - | Display size:5.5 inch | |||||
82.0 | ≈ | Display size:5.5 inch | |||||
82.0 | ≈ | Display size:5.5 inch | |||||
69.2 | Display size:4.7 inch | ||||||
58.0 | Display size:4 inch | ||||||
69.2 | Display size:4.7 inch | ||||||
50.0 | Display size:3.5 inch | ||||||
53.2 | Display size:3.7 inch |
RAM capacity
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | RAM capacity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20.0 | - | RAM size:1GB | |||||
50.0 | RAM size:2GB | ||||||
20.0 | ≈ | RAM size:1GB | |||||
20.0 | ≈ | RAM size:1GB | |||||
20.0 | ≈ | RAM size:1GB | |||||
50.0 | RAM size:2GB | ||||||
5.0 | RAM size:512.0MB | ||||||
20.0 | ≈ | RAM size:1GB |
storage size
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | storage size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.0 | - | Storage size:4GB | |||||
50.0 | Storage size:16GB | ||||||
11.0 | ≈ | Storage size:4GB | |||||
50.0 | Storage size:16GB | ||||||
24.0 | Storage size:8GB | ||||||
55.5 | Storage size:32GB | ||||||
5.0 | Storage size:2GB | ||||||
11.0 | ≈ | Storage size:4GB |
battery
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | battery | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
57.5 | - | Battery capacity:2500 mAh | |||||
65.0 | Battery capacity:3000 mAh | ||||||
57.5 | ≈ | Battery capacity:2500 mAh | |||||
47.0 | Battery capacity:1900 mAh | ||||||
51.2 | Battery capacity:2080 mAh | ||||||
52.3 | Battery capacity:2150 mAh | ||||||
27.2 | Battery capacity:1240 mAh | ||||||
33.8 | Battery capacity:1460 mAh |
rear-camera resolution
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | rear-camera resolution | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50.0 | - | Rear-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
61.7 | Rear-camera resolution:13 MP | ||||||
50.0 | ≈ | Rear-camera resolution:8 MP | |||||
59.6 | Rear-camera resolution:12.1 MP | ||||||
61.9 | Rear-camera resolution:13.1 MP | ||||||
61.9 | Rear-camera resolution:13.1 MP | ||||||
27.5 | Rear-camera resolution:5 MP | ||||||
26.8 | Rear-camera resolution:4.9 MP |
front-camera resolution
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | front-camera resolution | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
15.8 | - | Front-camera resolution:2 MP | |||||
50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | ||||||
15.8 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:2 MP | |||||
0.0 | Front-camera resolution:0.3 MP | ||||||
0.0 | Front-camera resolution:0.3 MP | ||||||
5.0 | Front-camera resolution:1 MP | ||||||
15.8 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:2 MP | |||||
0.0 | Front-camera resolution:0.3 MP |
grip
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | grip | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
52.3 | - | Color:White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm), Weight:189 oz (189 g) | |||||
59.2 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (75 mm) x 5.8 inches (148 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.6 mm), Weight:165 oz (165 g) | ||||||
52.3 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.1 inches (78 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm), Weight:189 oz (189 g) | |||||
69.9 | Color:White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.1 inches (130 mm) x 0.4 inches (11.3 mm), Weight:142 oz (142 g) | ||||||
79.6 | Color:/ / / /, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.4 inches (60 mm) x 4.8 inches (122 mm) x 0.5 inches (11.9 mm), Weight:119 oz (119 g) | ||||||
68.7 | Color:White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.2 inches (133 mm) x 0.4 inches (10.7 mm), Weight:145 oz (145 g) | ||||||
79.3 | Color:/ / / /, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.2 inches (56 mm) x 4.6 inches (117 mm) x 0.5 inches (13.4 mm), Weight:133 oz (133 g) | ||||||
83.0 | Color:Minnie White/Minnie Pink/Minnie Rose, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.3 inches (58 mm) x 4.5 inches (115 mm) x 0.5 inches (12 mm), Weight:116 oz (116 g) |
screen cleanliness
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen cleanliness | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27.4 | - | Display type:IPS, Screen resolution (width x height):540 x 960, Pixel density:200 ppi | |||||
53.7 | Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:267 ppi | ||||||
27.4 | ≈ | Display type:IPS, Screen resolution (width x height):540 x 960, Pixel density:200 ppi | |||||
64.3 | Display type:Super CG Silicon, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312 ppi | ||||||
47.3 | Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):480 x 854, Pixel density:244 ppi | ||||||
64.3 | Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312 ppi | ||||||
53.5 | Display type:TFT, Screen resolution (width x height):480 x 800, Pixel density:266 ppi | ||||||
53.0 | Display type:New ASV, Screen resolution (width x height):480 x 854, Pixel density:264 ppi |
performance
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | performance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16.5 | - | OS:Android, Chipset:MediaTek MT6577, CPU specs:1.3GHz×4(Quad core), RAM size:1GB | |||||
36.5 | OS:Android, Chipset:MediaTek MT6735, CPU specs:1.3GHz×4(Quad core), RAM size:2GB | ||||||
16.5 | ≈ | OS:Android, Chipset:MediaTek MT6735, CPU specs:1.3GHz×4(Quad core), RAM size:1GB | |||||
7.9 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960, CPU specs:1.5GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:1GB | ||||||
7.9 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960, CPU specs:1.5GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:1GB | ||||||
42.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:HiSilicon K3V2, CPU specs:1.5GHz×4(Quad core), RAM size:2GB | ||||||
5.7 | OS:Android, Chipset:APE5R, CPU specs:1.2GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:512.0MB | ||||||
2.1 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon S2 MSM8255, CPU specs:1.5GHz×1(Single core), RAM size:1GB |
Specifications of TONE freebit PandA 5.5
TONE freebit PandA 5.5 | ||||
Image | ![]() | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Maker | TCT Mobile | |||
Release date | 8/9, 2014 | |||
Color | White | |||
OS | Android | |||
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 3.1 inches (78 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm) | |||
Weight | 189 oz (189 g) | |||
Display size | 5.5 inch | |||
Display type | IPS | |||
Screen resolution (width x height) | 540 x 960 | |||
Pixel density | 200 ppi | |||
Battery capacity | 2500 mAh | |||
Chipset | MediaTek MT6577 | |||
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(Quad core) | |||
RAM size | 1GB | |||
Storage size | 4GB | |||
Rear-camera resolution | 8 MP | |||
Front-camera resolution | 2 MP | |||
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |