GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo review: worth buying?
Created date: 02/24/2018, 22:42:52, Updated date: 04/04/2020, 04:50:28
What are the strengths of the GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo? We explain its advantages and disadvantages when compared to other smartphone. Even if you are not used to choosing between different smartphone, you'll learn to make the decision of whether or not the GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo is right for you.
Summary of rating | Compare ratings with all 4428 smartphones |
---|
Aspect | Score |
---|---|
Grip | 67/100 |
Screen size | 70/100 |
Screen quality | 62/100 |
Battery life | 51/100 |
CPU specs | 19/100 |
Multi-tasking | 50/100 |
Camera specs | 32/100 |
Contents
- 1.Advantages and disadvantages of GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo
- 2.GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's features, performance, reviews
- 2-1.GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's size
- 2-2.GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's CPU specs
- 2-3.GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's storage size
- 2-4.GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's screen
- 2-5.GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's camera specs
- 2-6.GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's battery performance
- 2-7.GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's general rating
- 3.GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's specs
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's features, performance, reviews
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's camera specs
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo has a 8 MP main camera, which can serve you well in most cases. However, you might feel a little dissatisfied with the quality of the images.
Also, GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo has an 1.9 MP front camera, which is a very low figure. Unless you do not care about image quality, you should probably choose a higher-grade smartphone.
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's battery performance
The battery performance of the GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo is 2100 mAh, which is a normal capacity. Compared to other smartphones, the GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo has a normal amount of battery life. There is nothing to be worried about with everyday use. However, if you are using the internet or playing a game for a long time, you might feel a bit frustrated with the battery life.
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's size
The GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo has a width of 2.8 inches (71 mm), a length of 5.4 inches (137 mm), and a thickness of 0.4 inches (9.4 mm). It might be possible to operate it with one hand, but depending on the person it might feel big. In addition, the weight of the GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo is about 139 oz (139 g). Even if you are operating it with one hand it feels almost weightless. However, depending on the person, you may feel tired after using it for a while.
Assessing the overall ease of carrying the GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo in terms of size and weight, it will not be a problem for everyday use.
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's screen
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo has a 4.8 inch display. It is large enough and you will rarely encounter issues due to the screen size. However, note that it is not very suited for writing long text.
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo has a mid-range screen. It is OK for normal use, but if you want to enjoy photos, videos, or games at their best, you may feel dissatisfied.
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's CPU specs
With the 1.5GHz×2(Dual core) for processing power, the GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo has relatively low performance, and for gaming, watching movies and the like it may feel slightly lacking in power. However, for usage such as net browsing, phone calls, Twitter and Instagram you probably won't feel much stress.
With 2GB of RAM, the GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo has a sufficient amount. Very occasional cases of insufficient RAM do occur, but with this sort of amount of RAM, it will rarely be the cause of feeling any stress.
Evaluating the overall speed of operation of the GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo, it is categorized as a mid-range to low-end smartphone. You won't have much problem with everyday use but there will probably be a few cases when you feel it is slightly lacking in performance.
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's storage size
The data storage capacity of the GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo is 32GB, and while it is enough for taking photos, it might feel insufficient for those who often shoot videos or who install many games.
The GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo is compatible with SD cards, so it is possible to increase the capacity easily. Therefore, you probably do not need to be concerned with the storage capacity.
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's general rating
The GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo is a relatively capable smartphone. If used as the main smartphone, it may be somewhat inconvenient for everyday use, but it is at a generally acceptable level.
Advantages and disadvantages of GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo
Advantages of GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo
- It is lightweight.
- The display is large, so text and images appear clear on the screen.
Disadvantages of GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo
- It has a low-grade CPU, so you will experience severe stuttering when using an app.
- It has a very low-grade front camera, so it should not be considered as a main camera.
Comparing the specifications of GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo against similar products
body size
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 60.4 | - | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.4 inches (137 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.4 mm) | ||||
![]() | 47.2 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.2 inches (81 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.4 inches (10.4 mm) | |||||
![]() | 55.4 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (73 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.2 mm) | ||||
![]() | 50.8 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (77 mm) x 6.2 inches (158 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm) | |||||
![]() | 64.4 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.4 inches (138 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.3 mm) | ||||
![]() | 47.8 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.3 inches (83 mm) x 5.8 inches (147 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.9 mm) | |||||
![]() | 55.4 | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (73 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.3 mm) | |||||
![]() | 64.4 | ≈ | Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.7 inches (69 mm) x 5.2 inches (133 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm) |
body weight
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | body weight | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 74.7 | - | Weight:139 oz (139 g) | ||||
![]() | 54.8 | Weight:189 oz (189 g) | |||||
![]() | 67.2 | Weight:158 oz (158 g) | |||||
![]() | 69.1 | Weight:153 oz (153 g) | |||||
![]() | 70.7 | ≈ | Weight:149 oz (149 g) | ||||
![]() | 56.8 | Weight:184 oz (184 g) | |||||
![]() | 67.2 | Weight:158 oz (158 g) | |||||
![]() | 74.7 | ≈ | Weight:139 oz (139 g) |
screen size
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 70.8 | - | Display size:4.8 inch | ||||
![]() | 82.0 | Display size:5.5 inch | |||||
![]() | 82.0 | Display size:5.5 inch | |||||
![]() | 85.2 | Display size:5.7 inch | |||||
![]() | 69.2 | ≈ | Display size:4.7 inch | ||||
![]() | 78.8 | Display size:5.3 inch | |||||
![]() | 82.0 | Display size:5.5 inch | |||||
![]() | 69.2 | ≈ | Display size:4.7 inch |
screen resolution
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen resolution | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 41.7 | - | |||||
![]() | 41.7 | ≈ | |||||
![]() | 87.9 | ||||||
![]() | 68.7 | ||||||
![]() | 41.7 | ≈ | |||||
![]() | 45.2 | ≈ | |||||
![]() | 87.9 | ||||||
![]() | 41.7 | ≈ |
RAM capacity
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | RAM capacity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 50.0 | - | RAM size:2GB | ||||
![]() | 50.0 | ≈ | RAM size:2GB | ||||
![]() | 70.0 | RAM size:4GB | |||||
![]() | 50.0 | ≈ | RAM size:2GB | ||||
![]() | 60.0 | RAM size:3GB | |||||
![]() | 20.0 | RAM size:1GB | |||||
![]() | 70.0 | RAM size:4GB | |||||
![]() | 20.0 | RAM size:1GB |
storage size
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | storage size | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 55.5 | - | Storage size:32GB | ||||
![]() | 55.5 | ≈ | Storage size:32GB | ||||
![]() | 55.5 | ≈ | Storage size:32GB | ||||
![]() | 55.5 | ≈ | Storage size:32GB | ||||
![]() | 55.5 | ≈ | Storage size:32GB | ||||
![]() | 50.0 | Storage size:16GB | |||||
![]() | 55.5 | ≈ | Storage size:32GB | ||||
![]() | 50.0 | Storage size:16GB |
battery
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | battery | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 51.5 | - | Battery capacity:2100 mAh | ||||
![]() | 66.5 | Battery capacity:3100 mAh | |||||
![]() | 74.0 | Battery capacity:3600 mAh | |||||
![]() | 65.8 | Battery capacity:3050 mAh | |||||
![]() | 65.0 | Battery capacity:3000 mAh | |||||
![]() | 57.5 | Battery capacity:2500 mAh | |||||
![]() | 74.0 | Battery capacity:3600 mAh | |||||
![]() | 45.5 | Battery capacity:1850 mAh |
rear-camera resolution
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | rear-camera resolution | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 50.0 | - | Rear-camera resolution:8 MP | ||||
![]() | 50.1 | ≈ | Rear-camera resolution:8.1 MP | ||||
![]() | 59.8 | Rear-camera resolution:12.2 MP | |||||
![]() | 68.8 | Rear-camera resolution:16 MP | |||||
![]() | 68.8 | Rear-camera resolution:16 MP | |||||
![]() | 50.1 | ≈ | Rear-camera resolution:8.1 MP | ||||
![]() | 59.8 | Rear-camera resolution:12.2 MP | |||||
![]() | 50.1 | ≈ | Rear-camera resolution:8.1 MP |
front-camera resolution
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | front-camera resolution | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 14.7 | - | Front-camera resolution:1.9 MP | ||||
![]() | 14.7 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:1.9 MP | ||||
![]() | 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | |||||
![]() | 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | |||||
![]() | 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | |||||
![]() | 15.3 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:2 MP | ||||
![]() | 50.0 | Front-camera resolution:5 MP | |||||
![]() | 16.6 | ≈ | Front-camera resolution:2.1 MP |
grip
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | grip | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 67.6 | - | Color:Pebble Blue/Marble White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.4 inches (137 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.4 mm), Weight:139 oz (139 g) | ||||
![]() | 51.0 | Color:Marble White/Amber Brown, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.2 inches (81 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.4 inches (10.4 mm), Weight:189 oz (189 g) | |||||
![]() | 61.3 | Color:Black Onyx/White Pearl/Pink Gold/Blue Coral, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (73 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.2 mm), Weight:158 oz (158 g) | |||||
![]() | 60.0 | Color:/ /, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.0 inches (77 mm) x 6.2 inches (158 mm) x 0.3 inches (7.6 mm), Weight:153 oz (153 g) | |||||
![]() | 67.6 | ≈ | Color:Opal Pink/Moon White/Indigo Black/Aurora Green, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.6 inches (67 mm) x 5.4 inches (138 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.3 mm), Weight:149 oz (149 g) | ||||
![]() | 52.3 | Color:Ceramic White, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):3.3 inches (83 mm) x 5.8 inches (147 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.9 mm), Weight:184 oz (184 g) | |||||
![]() | 61.3 | Color:/ / /, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.9 inches (73 mm) x 5.9 inches (151 mm) x 0.3 inches (8.3 mm), Weight:158 oz (158 g) | |||||
![]() | 69.5 | ≈ | Color:/ /, Dimensions (width x height x thickness):2.7 inches (69 mm) x 5.2 inches (133 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.5 mm), Weight:139 oz (139 g) |
screen cleanliness
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | screen cleanliness | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 62.7 | - | Display type:EL, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:305 ppi | ||||
![]() | 53.7 | Display type:EL, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:267 ppi | |||||
![]() | 88.5 | Display type:Super AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1440 x 2560, Pixel density:534 ppi | |||||
![]() | 81.7 | Display type:Super AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1080 x 1920, Pixel density:386 ppi | |||||
![]() | 64.3 | ≈ | Display type:Super AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312 ppi | ||||
![]() | 57.7 | ≈ | Display type:EL, Screen resolution (width x height):800 x 1280, Pixel density:284 ppi | ||||
![]() | 88.5 | Display type:Super AMOLED, Screen resolution (width x height):1440 x 2560, Pixel density:534 ppi | |||||
![]() | 64.3 | ≈ | Display type:EL, Screen resolution (width x height):720 x 1280, Pixel density:312 ppi |
performance
Image | Product name | Review | Level of recommendation based on the comparison of the differences between the two | performance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 19.5 | - | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960, CPU specs:1.5GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:2GB | ||||
![]() | 45.8 | OS:Android, Chipset:Exynos 4412, CPU specs:1.6GHz×4(Quad core), RAM size:2GB | |||||
![]() | 57.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, CPU specs:2.15GHz×4(Quad core), RAM size:4GB | |||||
![]() | 58.8 | OS:Android, Chipset:Exynos 5433, CPU specs:1.9GHz+1.3GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:2GB | |||||
![]() | 77.7 | OS:Android, Chipset:Exynos 7870, CPU specs:1.6GHz×8(OctaCore), RAM size:3GB | |||||
![]() | 7.9 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon S3 APQ8060, CPU specs:1.5GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:1GB | |||||
![]() | 57.6 | OS:Android, Chipset:Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, CPU specs:2.15GHz×4(Quad core), RAM size:4GB | |||||
![]() | 7.2 | OS:Android, Chipset:C210 + QSC6085, CPU specs:1.4GHz×2(Dual core), RAM size:1GB |
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo's specs
GALAXY S III SC-06D docomo | ||||
Image | ![]() | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Maker | ||||
Brand | Galaxy | |||
Release date | 6/28, 2012 | |||
Color | Pebble Blue/Marble White | |||
OS | Android | |||
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 2.8 inches (71 mm) x 5.4 inches (137 mm) x 0.4 inches (9.4 mm) | |||
Weight | 139 oz (139 g) | |||
Display size | 4.8 inch | |||
Display type | EL | |||
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | |||
Pixel density | 305 ppi | |||
Battery capacity | 2100 mAh | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 | |||
CPU specs | 1.5GHz×2(Dual core) | |||
RAM size | 2GB | |||
Storage size | 32GB | |||
Rear-camera resolution | 8 MP | |||
Front-camera resolution | 1.9 MP | |||
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |